Classifier: The text contains the word "minimising", which uses the Australian/British 's' spelling. In a US context, this should be localized to the 'z' spelling ("minimizing"). The rest of the terminology ("line of best fit", "bivariate data") is standard across both locales.

Verifier: The answer text contains the word "minimising", which is the British/Australian spelling. For a US context, this should be localized to "minimizing". This is a spelling-only change.

Classifier: The text is bi-dialect neutral. All words used ("heavy", "light", "check", "carry", "move") have identical spelling and meaning in both Australian and American English. There are no units, specific educational terms, or cultural references requiring localization.

Verifier: The text is bi-dialect neutral. All words used ("heavy", "light", "check", "carry", "move") have identical spelling and meaning in both Australian and American English. There are no units, specific educational terms, or cultural references requiring localization.

Classifier: The content uses standard mathematical terminology (unit fraction, numerator, denominator, fraction bar) that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations (e.g., "centre" vs "center") or unit conversions required.

Verifier: The mathematical terminology used ("unit fraction", "numerator", "denominator", "fraction bar") is standard and identical in both US and Australian English. There are no spelling variations or units of measurement present in the text.

Classifier: The text uses standard, bi-dialect neutral terminology for data representation (table, bar chart, categories). There are no AU-specific spellings, units, or cultural references present.

Verifier: The text uses universal terminology for data representation and contains no spelling, units, or cultural references that require localization for the Australian context.

Classifier: The text "A kite is a 2D shape" uses geometric terminology that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations, units, or locale-specific terms present.

Verifier: The text "True or false: A kite is a $2$D shape." contains no locale-specific spelling, terminology, or units. The geometric term "kite" is used identically in both US and Australian English.

Classifier: The text uses standard graph theory terminology (path, trail, vertices, edges) which is universal across English dialects. There are no AU-specific spellings, units, or cultural references.

Verifier: The text consists of standard mathematical definitions in graph theory (path, trail, vertices, edges). These terms are universal in English-speaking academic contexts and do not require localization for the Australian market. There are no spelling differences, units, or cultural references present.

Classifier: The text discusses mathematical concepts (radians, circumference, pi, unit circle) using terminology and spelling that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no units to convert, no regional spellings (like 'centre'), and no school-system-specific context.

Verifier: The text uses universal mathematical terminology (radians, circumference, pi, unit circle) and spellings that are identical in US and Australian English. There are no units to convert, no regional spellings, and no school-system-specific context.

Classifier: The text uses standard mathematical terminology ("Venn diagrams", "set relationships", "data") that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations (e.g., -ise/-ize), no units of measurement, and no school-context terms that require localization.

Verifier: The text consists of standard mathematical terminology ("Venn diagrams", "set relationships") and general vocabulary that is identical in both US and Australian English. There are no spelling differences, units of measurement, or locale-specific school terms.

Classifier: The content uses standard mathematical terminology (quartic equation, graph, opens upwards/downwards) that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations, units, or locale-specific pedagogical terms present.

Verifier: The content consists of standard mathematical terminology ("quartic equation", "graph", "opens", "Upwards", "Downwards", "To the left", "To the right") that is identical in both US and Australian English. There are no spelling variations, units, or locale-specific pedagogical terms.

Classifier: The text uses standard statistical terminology ("stem and leaf plot", "data", "patterns", "clusters") that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations (e.g., "colour", "centre"), no metric units, and no school-context terms (e.g., "Year 7") that require localization.

Verifier: The text consists of standard statistical terminology ("split stem and leaf plot", "data", "patterns", "clusters", "gaps") that is identical in both US and Australian English. There are no spelling differences, units, or school-system specific terms present in the source or answer.

Classifier: The text discusses mathematical properties of functions (roots and factors) using terminology that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no units, locale-specific spellings, or educational context markers (like year levels) present.

Verifier: The text describes universal mathematical properties of functions and graphs. The terminology ("factor", "root", "x-axis", "sign") and spelling are identical in US and Australian English. There are no units, locale-specific educational terms, or spelling variations present.

Classifier: The text uses standard geometric terminology ("quadrilaterals", "sides", "corners") that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations, units, or locale-specific contexts present.

Verifier: The text consists of standard geometric definitions ("quadrilaterals", "sides", "corners") that are identical in US and Australian English. There are no spelling variations, units, or locale-specific terms present.

Classifier: The text is bi-dialect neutral. The vocabulary ("share", "equally", "everyone", "amount") and grammar are identical in both Australian and US English, with no region-specific spelling or units present.

Verifier: The text "Why is it good to know how to share things equally?" and "So everyone gets the same amount." contains no region-specific spelling, terminology, or units. It is perfectly valid in both US and Australian English without modification.

Classifier: The term "notes" is the standard Australian/British term for paper currency. In a US educational context, the term "bills" is used almost exclusively (e.g., "coins and bills"). While "banknote" is technically correct in the US, "notes" on its own in a primary school money context is a dialect-specific term that requires localization to "bills".

Verifier: The classifier correctly identified that "notes" is the standard term for paper currency in Australian/British English, whereas "bills" is the required term for US educational contexts (e.g., "coins and bills"). This is a terminology shift specific to the school/curriculum context of money units.

Classifier: The text is bi-dialect neutral. It contains no region-specific spelling (e.g., -ise/-ize, -our/-or), no units of measurement, and no terminology specific to the Australian or US school systems. The vocabulary used ("estimation", "angles", "designing", "building") is identical in both locales.

Verifier: The text is bi-dialect neutral. It contains no region-specific spelling, no units of measurement, and no terminology specific to the Australian or US school systems. The vocabulary used ("estimation", "angles", "designing", "building") is identical in both locales.

Classifier: The text uses basic geometric terminology ("triangle", "straight sides", "corners") that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations or unit measurements present.

Verifier: The text "What makes a shape a triangle?" and "A triangle has $3$ straight sides and $3$ corners." contains no locale-specific spelling, terminology, or units. The terminology is universal across English dialects.

Classifier: The text "A polygon is a closed shape" uses standard geometric terminology that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations (e.g., "centre"), no units, and no locale-specific context.

Verifier: The text "True or false: A polygon is a closed shape." consists of universal geometric definitions and standard English vocabulary that is identical in both US and Australian English. There are no spelling variations, units, or locale-specific terms present.

Classifier: The text "True or false: A parallelogram is not always a closed shape." uses standard geometric terminology and spelling that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no units, locale-specific terms, or spelling variations present.

Verifier: The text "True or false: A parallelogram is not always a closed shape." consists of universal geometric terminology and standard English spelling shared by both US and Australian English. There are no units, locale-specific educational terms, or spelling variations (like -ise/-ize or -our/-or) present in the question or the answer choices.

Classifier: The text contains the Australian spelling 'organised' (US: 'organized'). Additionally, 'timetable' and 'journey' are common AU/UK terms that are often localized to 'schedule' and 'trip' in a US context, though the spelling change alone is a definitive trigger for localization.

Verifier: The primary classifier correctly identified the spelling 'organised' (AU/UK) which requires localization to 'organized' (US). Additionally, 'timetable' and 'journey' are British/Australian lexical preferences that typically shift to 'schedule' and 'trip' in a US educational context, supporting the classification.

Classifier: The text uses universal mathematical terminology ("number line", "halves", "whole") and standard English spelling that is identical in both Australian and American English. There are no units, locale-specific terms, or spelling variations present.

Verifier: The text consists of universal mathematical concepts and terminology. There are no spelling differences (e.g., "halves", "whole", "number line" are identical in US and AU English), no units of measurement, and no locale-specific pedagogical terms. The classification as truly unchanged is correct.

Classifier: The content uses standard mathematical terminology (graph, vertices, edges, loop) that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations, units, or locale-specific contexts present.

Verifier: The content consists of standard mathematical terminology (graph, vertices, edges, loop) that is identical in both US and Australian English. There are no spelling variations, units, or locale-specific contexts that require localization.

Classifier: The text uses standard statistical terminology ("back-to-back stem plot", "distributions") that is common to both Australian and US English. There are no spelling differences (e.g., "plot" vs "graph" is not a locale-specific requirement here), no units, and no school-context terms that require localization.

Verifier: The text consists of standard statistical terminology ("back-to-back stem plot", "distributions") that is identical in both US and Australian English. There are no spelling variations, units, or locale-specific educational terms present.

Classifier: The geometric terms used in the question and answers ("quadrilateral", "rhombus", "triangle", "sphere", "circle") are universal across Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations (like centre/center) or terminology differences (like trapezium/trapezoid) present in this specific entity group.

Verifier: The terminology used ("quadrilateral", "rhombus", "triangle", "sphere", "circle") is identical in both US and Australian English. There are no spelling variations or regional terminology differences present in this content.

Classifier: The text uses universal mathematical terminology ("sequence", "rule", "pattern", "series", "function") that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations, units, or locale-specific contexts present.

Verifier: The content consists of universal mathematical terms ("sequence", "rule", "pattern", "series", "function") that do not vary between US and Australian English. There are no spelling differences, units, or locale-specific pedagogical contexts present.

Classifier: The text is bi-dialect neutral. It contains no AU-specific spellings, terminology, or units. The concept of direction of turning is universal and does not require localization for a US audience.

Verifier: The text is bi-dialect neutral. It contains no AU-specific spellings, terminology, or units. The concept of direction of turning is universal and does not require localization for a US audience.

Classifier: The text is bi-dialect neutral. It discusses the general concept of reading scales and weighing items without mentioning specific units (like grams or ounces) or using region-specific spelling (like 'gramme'). The vocabulary ('weighing', 'cooking', 'shopping') is common to both AU and US English.

Verifier: The text is neutral and does not contain any region-specific spelling, terminology, or units. It discusses the general concept of reading scales and weighing items, which is applicable to both US and AU English without modification.

Classifier: The term "trapezium" is used in the answer choices. In Australian English (and UK English), a trapezium is a quadrilateral with at least one pair of parallel sides. In US English, this shape is called a "trapezoid". This is a standard terminology difference in a school/mathematical context.

Verifier: The primary classifier correctly identified that "trapezium" is the standard term in Australian/UK English for what is called a "trapezoid" in US English. This is a specific terminology difference within a mathematical/school context.

Classifier: The text uses standard statistical terminology ("line of best fit", "predictions", "trends") that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations, units, or school-system-specific terms present.

Verifier: The text "What makes a line of best fit useful for making predictions?" and its corresponding answer contain no locale-specific spelling, terminology, units, or school system references. The terminology is standard across English dialects.

Classifier: The text uses standard mathematical terminology ("quartic equation", "concave down", "U shaped curve") that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no units, regional spellings, or locale-specific educational terms present.

Verifier: The text consists of standard mathematical terminology ("quartic equation", "concave down", "U shaped curve") and LaTeX notation that is identical in both US and Australian English. There are no regional spellings, units, or locale-specific educational terms that require localization.

Classifier: The text uses basic spatial terminology (above, below, next to) that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations, metric units, or school-system-specific terms present.

Verifier: The text consists of universal spatial terminology ("above", "below", "next to") that is identical in US and Australian English. There are no spelling differences, units, or school-system-specific terms.

Classifier: The text uses standard mathematical notation and terminology (vertical asymptote, horizontal asymptote, intersection) that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no units, regional spellings, or school-context terms present.

Verifier: The text consists of mathematical notation and standard terminology (vertical asymptote, horizontal asymptote, intersection) that is identical in both US and Australian English. There are no regional spellings, units, or school-specific terms that require localization.

Classifier: The content uses standard mathematical terminology (dilation, reflection, matrix, x-axis, y-axis) that is universally understood in both Australian and US English. There are no locale-specific spellings (e.g., "centre"), units, or curriculum-specific terms that require adjustment. While the phrasing "followed the reflection" is missing the word "by", this is a minor grammatical error rather than a localization issue. The use of "dilation" for non-isometric scaling is common in both regions.

Verifier: The content consists of mathematical matrices and descriptions of transformations (dilation, reflection, x-axis, y-axis). These terms and the notation used are standard in both US and Australian English. There are no spelling differences (like "center" vs "centre"), no units to convert, and no curriculum-specific terminology that requires localization. The grammatical omission of "by" in "followed the reflection" is a source error, not a localization issue.

Classifier: The text "The size of an angle is called its..." and the corresponding answer choices ("magnitude", "measurement", "size", "value") use standard mathematical terminology that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations, units, or locale-specific pedagogical terms present.

Verifier: The content consists of standard mathematical terminology ("magnitude", "measurement", "size", "value") that is identical in both US and Australian English. There are no spelling variations, units, or locale-specific pedagogical terms present.

Classifier: The text uses universal mathematical terminology ("unit squares", "area", "surface") that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations, specific units (like cm or inches), or school-system-specific terms present.

Verifier: The text consists of universal mathematical concepts ("unit squares", "area", "surface") that do not have spelling or terminology variations between US and Australian English. No specific units or school-system-specific references are present.

Classifier: The text uses universal mathematical terminology ("Venn diagram") and basic English vocabulary that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling differences, unit measurements, or locale-specific terms present.

Verifier: The text consists of universal mathematical terminology and standard English vocabulary with no spelling, unit, or terminology differences between US and Australian English.

Classifier: The text uses standard geometric terminology (polygon, sides, closed, straight) that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations (e.g., 'centre'), no units, and no school-system-specific terms.

Verifier: The content consists of standard geometric definitions (polygon, closed, sides, straight) that are identical in US and Australian English. There are no spelling variations, units, or locale-specific terminology present in the question or the answer choices.

Classifier: The mathematical terminology used ("fraction", "numerator", "denominator", "quotient", "dividend") is identical in both Australian and American English. There are no spelling variations or regional terms present.

Verifier: The terminology used ("fraction", "numerator", "denominator", "quotient", "dividend") is standard across all English locales, including US and AU. There are no spelling variations or regional pedagogical differences in these terms.

Classifier: The term "Co-interior angles" is the standard terminology in Australia (and the UK) for angles between parallel lines on the same side of a transversal. In the United States, this concept is almost exclusively referred to as "Consecutive interior angles" or "Same-side interior angles". While "Co-interior" is mathematically understood, it is not the standard pedagogical term in US geometry curricula, necessitating a shift for locale alignment.

Verifier: The term "Co-interior angles" is a specific technical term used in Australian and UK geometry curricula. In the United States, the standard pedagogical term is "Consecutive interior angles" or "Same-side interior angles". This falls under RED.terminology_school_context rather than GRAY.style_tone_locale_shift, as it is a direct substitution of a mathematical term specific to the educational system.

Classifier: The text uses standard mathematical terminology ("carry", "ones place", "tens place") that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no units, regional spellings, or locale-specific contexts present.

Verifier: The text uses standard mathematical terminology ("carry", "ones place", "tens place") that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no units, regional spellings, or locale-specific contexts present.

Classifier: The text uses standard mathematical terminology and phrasing that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no units, region-specific spellings, or school-system-specific terms.

Verifier: The text uses universal mathematical terminology and standard English vocabulary that is identical in both US and Australian English. There are no units, spelling variations, or region-specific educational terms present.

Classifier: The text uses universal mathematical terminology ("number line", "bigger", "to the right") that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations, units, or school-system-specific terms present.

Verifier: The text consists of universal mathematical concepts and terminology ("number line", "bigger", "right") that are identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling differences, units, or locale-specific pedagogical terms.

Classifier: The content uses standard mathematical terminology (intercept, coordinate axes, origin) that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations, units, or locale-specific pedagogical terms present.

Verifier: The content consists of standard mathematical definitions and terminology (intercept, coordinate, axes, origin) that are identical in both US and Australian English. There are no spelling differences, units of measurement, or locale-specific pedagogical variations present in the text.

Classifier: The text uses standard mathematical terminology ("fraction", "decimal", "percentage", "variable") and a definition ("number that represents a part of a whole") that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling differences, units, or locale-specific contexts present.

Verifier: The content consists of a standard mathematical definition and four vocabulary terms ("decimal", "fraction", "percentage", "variable"). There are no spelling differences (e.g., "percentage" is universal), no units of measurement, and no locale-specific terminology or pedagogical contexts that differ between US and Australian English. The classification as truly unchanged is correct.

Classifier: The text contains the AU spelling 'centre' (US: 'center') and uses metric units 'cm' (US: 'in.' or 'inches'). Since there are only two unit-bearing values (12 and 18) and the relationship is a simple geometric calculation (Pythagorean theorem), this qualifies as a simple conversion where the units should be localized to US customary to match US curriculum standards.

Verifier: The content contains the AU spelling 'centre' and metric units 'cm'. There are only two numeric values involved in a simple geometric calculation (Pythagorean theorem), which fits the definition of a simple conversion where the units and values should be localized to US customary standards.

Classifier: The text uses universal mathematical terminology ("denominators", "unit fractions") and neutral descriptive language ("bigger", "bottom", "parts"). There are no AU-specific spellings, metric units, or locale-specific educational terms present.

Verifier: The text consists of universal mathematical concepts (denominators, unit fractions) and descriptive language that does not contain any locale-specific spelling, units, or terminology. The primary classifier's assessment is correct.

Classifier: The term "truncus" is a specific mathematical term used in the Australian curriculum (specifically Victoria/VCE) to describe a function of the form y = a/(x-h)^2 + k. In the US, this is typically referred to as a "rational function" or more specifically a "squared reciprocal function" or "inverse square function," as "truncus" is not a standard term in US mathematics pedagogy.

Verifier: The classifier correctly identified that "truncus" is a specific mathematical term used in the Australian (VCE) curriculum that is not used in US mathematics. In the US, this function is typically described as a rational function or a squared reciprocal function. This falls under school-specific terminology that requires localization for a US audience.

Classifier: The content uses standard geometric terminology (rhombus, opposite sides, intersecting, congruent, perpendicular, parallel) that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations (e.g., "centre"), units, or school-context terms present.

Verifier: The content consists of standard geometric terms (rhombus, intersecting, congruent, perpendicular, parallel) that are spelled and used identically in both US and Australian English. There are no units, school-specific terminology, or spelling variations present.

Classifier: The text discusses general mathematical principles regarding units of measurement without specifying any particular unit (metric or imperial) or using any dialect-specific spelling or terminology. It is bi-dialect neutral.

Verifier: The text discusses the conceptual requirement for consistent units in a mathematical formula without referencing any specific unit system (metric or imperial). It is universally applicable and requires no localization.

Classifier: The text uses universal mathematical terminology ("mixed numbers", "number line", "wholes", "fractions") that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling differences, unit measurements, or locale-specific pedagogical terms present.

Verifier: The text consists of universal mathematical concepts ("mixed numbers", "number line", "wholes", "fractions") that do not vary between US and Australian English. There are no spelling differences, unit measurements, or locale-specific pedagogical terms.

Classifier: The text uses standard geometric terminology (perimeter, edges, corners, unit squares) that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations, regional terms, or unit measurements that require localization.

Verifier: The text consists of standard geometric concepts (perimeter, unit squares, edges, corners) that are identical in US and Australian English. There are no spelling differences, regional terminology, or specific units of measurement that require localization.

Classifier: The text uses standard statistical terminology ("regression line", "scatterplot", "regression equation") and mathematical notation ($x$-values, $y$-values) that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations, units, or locale-specific pedagogical terms present.

Verifier: The text consists of universal mathematical and statistical terminology ("regression line", "scatterplot", "regression equation") and notation ($x$-values, $y$-values). There are no spelling differences (e.g., -ize vs -ise), units of measurement, or locale-specific pedagogical terms present. The content is identical for both US and AU English.

Classifier: The text discusses fundamental mathematical concepts (fractions, numerators, denominators) using terminology that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations, unit measurements, or locale-specific pedagogical terms present.

Verifier: The text consists of universal mathematical concepts regarding fractions (numerators, denominators). There are no spelling variations (e.g., "color" vs "colour"), no units of measurement, and no locale-specific pedagogical terms. The content is identical in US and Australian English.

Classifier: The content uses standard mathematical terminology (universal set, null, empty, subset) that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations, units, or locale-specific contexts present.

Verifier: The content consists of standard mathematical definitions (universal set, null, empty, subset) that are identical in both US and Australian English. There are no spelling variations, units, or locale-specific contexts that require localization.

Classifier: The text discusses place value (ones and tens), which is universal terminology in both Australian and US English mathematics. There are no spelling differences, unit measurements, or locale-specific terms present.

Verifier: The content discusses place value (ones and tens), which is standard mathematical terminology in both US and Australian English. There are no spelling variations, units of measurement, or locale-specific pedagogical terms that require localization.

Classifier: The content uses universal geometric terminology ("parallelogram", "edges") and standard English phrasing that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations, metric units, or locale-specific terms present.

Verifier: The content "A parallelogram always has four edges" uses standard geometric terminology and English spelling that is identical in both US and Australian English. There are no units, locale-specific terms, or spelling variations present.

Classifier: The text discusses mathematical concepts (intercepts, general form, lines, graphs) using terminology that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations (e.g., "general form" vs "standard form" is a naming convention difference, but "general form" is widely used and understood in both locales), no units, and no school-context specific terms.

Verifier: The text uses standard mathematical terminology ("intercepts", "general form", "graph") that is identical in both US and Australian English. There are no spelling differences, units of measurement, or locale-specific pedagogical terms present in the source text.

Classifier: The text "A sequence following a specific rule is called a" and the associated answer choices ("pattern", "sequence", "series", "function") use standard mathematical terminology that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations, unit measurements, or locale-specific pedagogical terms present.

Verifier: The content consists of standard mathematical terminology ("sequence", "pattern", "series", "function") that is identical in US and Australian English. There are no spelling variations, units, or locale-specific contexts present.

Classifier: The text uses standard statistical terminology ("line of best fit", "trend", "data points") that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations, units, or locale-specific pedagogical terms present.

Verifier: The text consists of standard mathematical/statistical terminology ("line of best fit", "trend", "data points") that is identical in both US and Australian English. There are no spelling variations, units, or locale-specific pedagogical terms present.

Classifier: The text uses standard geometric terminology ("angles", "arc", "measure", "protractor") that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations (e.g., "labelled" is the standard spelling in AU, and while US often uses "labeled", "labelled" is an accepted variant and the overall context contains no units or region-specific pedagogical terms requiring change). However, looking closer at "labelled", it is the AU/UK spelling. But per the decision rules, if the text is bi-dialect neutral and no localization action is strictly needed for comprehension or standard US curriculum alignment, GREEN is appropriate. Actually, "labelled" (double L) is specifically AU/UK, whereas US is "labeled". However, the prompt asks to pick GREEN when no localization action is needed. Given the simplicity, this is bi-dialect neutral.

Verifier: The source text contains the word "labelled", which is the standard Australian/British spelling. In US English, the standard spelling is "labeled". Since the primary classifier acknowledged this spelling difference in its rationale but incorrectly chose GREEN.truly_unchanged, the classification must be corrected to RED.spelling_only.

Classifier: The text uses standard mathematical terminology ("tree diagram", "outcomes") and spelling ("organises" is the only potential point of contention, but "organises" is the standard AU spelling and the US "organizes" is a simple suffix change; however, looking at the specific text, "organises" is used in the answer. Wait, "organises" is AU spelling. Let me re-evaluate. Actually, "organises" contains an 's' which is the AU/UK spelling. The US spelling is "organizes". Therefore, this requires a spelling-only localization.

Verifier: The source text contains the word "organises", which is the standard Australian/British spelling. The US English equivalent is "organizes". This falls under a spelling-only localization requirement.

Classifier: The text discusses a mathematical concept (Venn diagrams) using terminology that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no units, regional spellings, or school-system-specific terms present.

Verifier: The content describes a mathematical concept (Venn diagrams) using universal terminology. There are no regional spellings, units of measurement, or school-system-specific terms that require localization between US and Australian English.

Classifier: The text "How can counting by twos help you count faster?" and the answer "You skip numbers and reach bigger numbers more quickly" use universal English terminology and spelling. There are no AU-specific terms, spellings, or units present.

Verifier: The text "How can counting by twos help you count faster?" and the answer "You skip numbers and reach bigger numbers more quickly" use standard English spelling and terminology that is identical in both US and AU English. There are no units or locale-specific contexts requiring localization.

Classifier: The text is bi-dialect neutral. It uses standard mathematical terminology ("equal angles", "measuring") and contains no AU-specific spellings, units, or school-context terms.

Verifier: The text "Why do we mark equal angles?" and its corresponding answer are bi-dialect neutral. There are no spelling differences (e.g., "color" vs "colour"), no region-specific terminology, and no units of measurement involved. The classifier correctly identified this as truly unchanged.

Classifier: The text uses standard statistical terminology (histogram, distribution, clusters, gaps, peaks) that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations (e.g., -ise/-ize, -our/-or), no units of measurement, and no school-context terms.

Verifier: The text consists of standard statistical terminology ("histogram", "distribution", "clusters", "gaps", "peaks") that is identical in US and Australian English. There are no spelling variations, units of measurement, or locale-specific educational terms present.

Classifier: The text contains both an AU-specific spelling ("factorised" vs US "factorized") and a specific mathematical term ("null factor law") which is commonly referred to as the "Zero Product Property" in US curriculum contexts.

Verifier: The classifier correctly identified both a spelling difference ("factorised" vs "factorized") and a significant curriculum-specific terminology difference. The "null factor law" is the standard term in Australia (AU), whereas the "Zero Product Property" is the standard term in the United States (US). This requires localization beyond simple spelling.

Classifier: The text discusses mathematical concepts (common denominators) using terminology that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations (e.g., "denominator" is universal), no units of measurement, and no school-system specific context.

Verifier: The text contains mathematical terminology (denominator, multiple, fractions) that is identical in both US and Australian English. There are no spelling differences, units of measurement, or locale-specific educational references.

Classifier: The text uses neutral terminology and contains no AU-specific spellings, units, or cultural references. The mathematical problem is bi-dialect neutral.

Verifier: The text is entirely neutral with no spelling, terminology, or unit differences between US and AU English. The mathematical problem is universal.

Classifier: The text uses universal academic English and mathematical terminology (dependent/independent events) that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations, unit measurements, or locale-specific school terms.

Verifier: The text and answer choices use universal mathematical terminology and standard English spelling that is identical in both US and Australian English. There are no units, locale-specific school terms, or spelling variations present.

Classifier: The text uses standard geometric terminology ("cyclic quadrilateral", "sum of all the angles") and mathematical notation that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no units, spellings, or cultural references requiring localization.

Verifier: The text uses universal mathematical terminology ("cyclic quadrilateral", "sum of all the angles") and notation (degrees) that are identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling differences or regional units involved.

Classifier: The text contains the word "organise", which uses the British/Australian 's' spelling. In US English, this must be localized to "organize" with a 'z'. The rest of the text is bi-dialect neutral.

Verifier: The primary classifier correctly identified the word "organise" in the answer field, which is the British/Australian spelling. For US English localization, this requires a spelling change to "organize". The classification "RED.spelling_only" is accurate.

Classifier: The text contains the Australian/British spelling of "centre", which needs to be localized to the US spelling "center". The mathematical concept (chord properties in a circle) is universal, and there are no units or specific school-system terminology involved beyond this spelling difference.

Verifier: The primary classifier correctly identified that the only localization required is the spelling change from "centre" (AU/British) to "center" (US). The mathematical content is a universal geometric theorem and does not involve specific school systems, units, or complex conversions.

Classifier: The text uses "cup" as a unit of measurement, which is standard in both Australian and American English for recipe-based math problems. There are no spelling differences (e.g., "denominator", "total", "recipe" are the same) and no regional terminology that requires adjustment.

Verifier: The text uses "cup" as a unit of measurement, which is standard in both Australian and American English for recipe-based math problems. There are no spelling differences (e.g., "denominator", "total", "recipe" are the same) and no regional terminology that requires adjustment.

Classifier: The text uses universal mathematical terminology ("composite shape", "basic shapes", "area", "rectangles", "triangles") that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no units, spelling variations, or locale-specific pedagogical terms present.

Verifier: The text consists of universal mathematical concepts and terminology ("composite shape", "area", "rectangles", "triangles") that are identical in US and Australian English. There are no units, spelling variations, or locale-specific pedagogical differences present.

Classifier: The text is bi-dialect neutral. It contains no AU-specific spellings, units, or terminology. The concept of reading a scale for measurement is universal across both Australian and US English.

Verifier: The text is bi-dialect neutral. It contains no region-specific spelling, terminology, or units. The concept of reading a scale is universal and the language used does not require localization for an Australian audience.

Classifier: The text uses standard geometric terminology ("quadrilaterals", "sides") and etymological explanations ("quad means four") that are identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations (e.g., "centre", "colour"), metric units, or school-context terms present.

Verifier: The text consists of geometric definitions and etymological explanations that are identical in US and Australian English. There are no spelling variations, units, or locale-specific terminology present.

Classifier: The text discusses fundamental mathematical concepts (addition, subtraction, parts, and wholes) using terminology that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations, units, or locale-specific contexts present.

Verifier: The text consists of a general mathematical explanation regarding the relationship between addition, subtraction, parts, and wholes. There are no spelling differences (e.g., "color" vs "colour"), no units of measurement, and no locale-specific terminology or educational context that would require localization between US and Australian English.

Classifier: The content uses standard cartographic terminology (grid, compass, legend, scale) that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations, units, or locale-specific pedagogical terms present.

Verifier: The content consists of standard cartographic terms (grid, compass, legend, scale) and a general definition that are identical in US and Australian English. There are no spelling variations, units, or locale-specific pedagogical differences.

Classifier: The text uses standard mathematical terminology ("axes", "line graph") and general vocabulary that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling differences, unit measurements, or locale-specific contexts.

Verifier: The text uses universal mathematical terminology ("axes", "line graph") and general vocabulary that is identical in both US and Australian English. There are no spelling variations, units of measurement, or locale-specific references.

Classifier: The text uses universal graph theory and urban planning terminology ("network", "vertex", "degree", "intersection", "bridge") that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling differences or unit conversions required.

Verifier: The text uses universal mathematical (graph theory) and general urban terminology that does not vary between US and Australian English. There are no spelling differences, unit conversions, or locale-specific references required.

Classifier: The text uses universal mathematical terminology ("counting by", "whole numbers", "halves") that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations, units, or locale-specific contexts present.

Verifier: The text uses universal mathematical terminology and standard English spelling common to both US and AU locales. No localization is required.

Classifier: The text uses standard English terminology for time (AM/PM, morning, afternoon) that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling differences, unit conversions, or locale-specific pedagogical terms required.

Verifier: The text uses universal terminology for time (AM, PM, morning, afternoon, timetables) that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations, unit conversions, or locale-specific pedagogical differences.

Classifier: The text uses standard mathematical terminology (quartic equation, turning point, inflection point) that is consistent across both Australian and US English. There are no regional spellings (e.g., "centre", "colour"), no metric units, and no school-context terms (e.g., "Year 10") that require localization.

Verifier: The text uses standard mathematical terminology (quartic equation, turning point, inflection point) that is identical in both US and Australian English. There are no regional spellings, units, or school-specific terms that require localization.

Classifier: The term "anticlockwise" is the standard British/Australian term for what is exclusively called "counterclockwise" in US English. This is a spelling/terminology localization requirement.

Verifier: The term "anticlockwise" is the standard British/Australian term for the US English "counterclockwise". This is a spelling/terminology localization requirement.

Classifier: The text describes a mathematical property of a quartic equation using standard terminology ("quartic equation", "opens upward") and notation that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no units, regional spellings, or context-specific terms requiring localization.

Verifier: The text is a mathematical statement about a quartic equation. The terminology ("quartic equation", "opens upward") and the LaTeX notation are standard across both US and Australian English. There are no regional spellings, units, or curriculum-specific terms that require localization.

Classifier: The content is a standard geometry problem regarding circle theorems (angles in the same segment). The terminology ("chord", "subtends", "segment") and notation are universal across Australian and US English. There are no units of measurement other than degrees, which are bi-dialect neutral, and no region-specific spellings or contexts.

Verifier: The content is a standard geometry problem involving circle theorems. The terminology ("chord", "subtends", "segment") and notation are universal. There are no region-specific spellings, units of measurement (other than degrees, which are universal), or cultural contexts that require localization.

Classifier: The term "anti-clockwise" is the standard Australian/British term. In a US educational context, "counter-clockwise" is the standard terminology used in mathematics.

Verifier: The term "anti-clockwise" is the standard British/Australian mathematical term, whereas "counter-clockwise" is the standard term in a US educational context. This falls under terminology school context.

Classifier: The text uses neutral, bi-dialect terminology ("dots", "chosen", "people") with no AU-specific spelling, units, or school context terms. It is universally applicable to both AU and US English.

Verifier: The text consists of universal mathematical logic and neutral vocabulary ("dots", "chosen", "people"). There are no spelling differences, unit measurements, or region-specific educational terms that require localization between US and AU English.

Classifier: The entity group contains the word "colour", which is the Australian/British spelling. In a US context, this must be localized to "color". No other terminology or units are present that require complex conversion.

Verifier: The source text contains the word "colour" in one of the answer choices. This is the British/Australian spelling and requires localization to "color" for a US context. No other localization triggers are present.

Classifier: The text uses standard geometric terminology ("transversal", "parallel lines", "alternate interior angles", "congruent") that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no units, spellings, or cultural references requiring localization.

Verifier: The primary classifier is correct. The text consists of standard geometric terminology ("transversal", "parallel lines", "alternate interior angles", "congruent") which is identical in US and Australian English. There are no spelling differences, units, or cultural contexts requiring localization.

Classifier: The question uses a single metric unit (meters) in a simple geometric context. Following the decision rules, this is a simple conversion (<=4 numbers, straightforward numeric change) where the unit should be localized to US customary (feet). The suffix also requires localization from 'm' to 'ft'.

Verifier: The question contains a single metric value (6 m) in a simple trigonometry context. Converting this to US customary units (e.g., feet) is a straightforward numeric change that does not require complex re-derivation of math or handling of interlinked equations. The suffix 'm' also requires localization. This fits the definition of RED.units_simple_conversion.

Classifier: The content consists of coordinate geometry and axis identification. The terminology ("x-axis", "y-axis", "z-axis") and the mathematical notation for points are universal across Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations, units, or school-context terms present.

Verifier: The content involves 3D coordinate geometry. The terminology ("x-axis", "y-axis", "z-axis") and the notation for points (x, y, z) are identical in both US and Australian English. There are no spelling differences, units, or locale-specific pedagogical terms.

Classifier: The text uses universal mathematical terminology ("steepness", "line segment", "graph", "variable", "rate of change") that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling differences, units, or locale-specific contexts present.

Verifier: The text consists of universal mathematical concepts and terminology. There are no spelling differences (e.g., "color" vs "colour"), no units of measurement, and no locale-specific educational contexts. The primary classifier correctly identified this as truly unchanged.

Classifier: The text uses universal mathematical terminology (addition, subtraction, total) that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations, unit measurements, or locale-specific educational terms present.

Verifier: The text consists of universal mathematical concepts (addition, subtraction, total, parts) that do not vary between US and Australian English. There are no spelling differences, unit measurements, or locale-specific educational terms.

Classifier: The terminology used ("composite shape", "complex shape", "irregular", "regular") is standard in both Australian and US mathematics curricula. There are no spelling differences (e.g., "color" vs "colour") or metric units involved.

Verifier: The terminology "composite shape", "complex shape", "irregular", and "regular" is universally used in English-speaking mathematics curricula (US, UK, AU, etc.). There are no spelling variations, units, or locale-specific pedagogical terms present in the source text.

Classifier: The text is bi-dialect neutral. It uses standard mathematical and business terminology ("formula of a line", "predicting cost") that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling differences, units, or school-context terms present.

Verifier: The text "Why is finding the formula of a line important in solving problems like predicting cost?" and the answer "It links $x$ and $y$, which helps us calculate costs and make predictions." are both bi-dialect neutral. There are no spelling differences (e.g., "color" vs "colour"), no specific school-context terms, and no units of measurement. The terminology is standard across US and AU English.

Classifier: The text discusses geometric properties (cylinder height and volume) using universal terminology. There are no units, AU-specific spellings, or locale-specific contexts present.

Verifier: The text describes a general geometric principle regarding cylinders and volume. It contains no units, no locale-specific terminology, and no spelling variations between US and AU English. It is truly universal.

Classifier: The text uses standard mathematical terminology ("mixed numbers", "number line") and general vocabulary ("pattern", "visually") that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations, metric units, or locale-specific pedagogical terms present.

Verifier: The text uses universal mathematical terminology ("mixed numbers", "number line") and standard English spelling common to both US and Australian English. There are no units, locale-specific pedagogical terms, or spelling variations present.

Classifier: The text discusses graph theory (faces, edges, adjacency) using terminology that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations, units, or school-context terms present.

Verifier: The text uses standard mathematical terminology (faces, edges, graphs, adjacent, boundary) that is identical in US and Australian English. There are no spelling differences, units, or locale-specific contexts present.

Classifier: The text uses standard mathematical terminology ("fraction", "number line") and universal English spelling ("smaller", "bigger", "placed"). There are no AU-specific spellings, units, or school-context terms that require localization for a US audience.

Verifier: The text uses universal mathematical terminology and spelling that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no units, locale-specific terms, or spelling variations (e.g., -ise/-ize, -our/-or) present in the source or answer.

Classifier: The text uses standard statistical terminology ("stem and leaf plot", "stems", "leaves") that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations, units, or locale-specific contexts present.

Verifier: The text "Why do we sometimes split stems in a stem and leaf plot?" and its corresponding answer use standard statistical terminology that is identical in US and Australian English. There are no spelling differences (e.g., "color" vs "colour"), no units of measurement, and no locale-specific educational contexts that require localization.

Classifier: The text uses universal mathematical terminology ("formulas", "visual pattern", "rule", "terms") that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations, units, or locale-specific pedagogical terms present.

Verifier: The text "Why must formulas work for any stage in a visual pattern?" and the answer "A formula is the rule for the whole pattern, not just the first few terms." contain no locale-specific spelling, terminology, or units. The language is universal across English dialects.

Classifier: The text describes a probability/combinatorics problem using universal terminology (Win, Draw, Loss) and standard English spelling. There are no AU-specific terms, metric units, or school-context markers that require localization for a US audience.

Verifier: The content uses universal sports terminology (Win, Draw, Loss) and standard English spelling. There are no units, locale-specific school terms, or spelling differences between AU and US English in this text. The mathematical logic is independent of locale.

Classifier: The text discusses mathematical concepts (dependent/independent events, probabilities, percentages, proportions, frequencies) that are bi-dialect neutral. There are no AU-specific spellings, units, or terminology present.

Verifier: The content consists of standard mathematical terminology (dependent/independent events, probabilities, percentages, proportions, frequencies) that is identical in both US and AU English. There are no spelling differences, units, or localized contexts present.

Classifier: The content uses universal terminology for compass directions (East) which is identical in both Australian and American English. There are no spelling, unit, or terminology differences.

Verifier: The text "True or false: On a compass, the letter E means East." contains no locale-specific spelling, terminology, or units. Compass directions and the phrasing used are identical in both US and Australian English.

Classifier: The text consists of basic arithmetic facts and a general explanation of the relationship between addition and subtraction. There are no AU-specific spellings, terminology, units, or cultural references. The name "Lara" is common in both AU and US locales.

Verifier: The content consists of universal mathematical facts and a general explanation of the relationship between addition and subtraction. There are no locale-specific spellings, terminology, units, or cultural references that require localization for the Australian market.

Classifier: The text is bi-dialect neutral. It uses standard English vocabulary ("dots", "popular", "choice", "people") that does not vary between Australian and US English. There are no units, spellings, or school-context terms requiring localization.

Verifier: The text is bi-dialect neutral. It uses standard English vocabulary ("dots", "popular", "choice", "people") that does not vary between Australian and US English. There are no units, spellings, or school-context terms requiring localization.

Classifier: The text uses standard geometric terminology ("square", "quadrilateral", "right angles") and spelling that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no units, currency, or locale-specific references.

Verifier: The text consists of standard geometric definitions and terminology ("square", "quadrilateral", "right angles") that are identical in US and Australian English. There are no units, locale-specific spellings, or cultural references requiring localization.

Classifier: The text discusses basic geometric properties (the definition of a triangle) using language that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations, unit measurements, or locale-specific terminology present.

Verifier: The text describes a fundamental geometric definition (a triangle has three sides) using standard English that is identical in both US and Australian locales. There are no spelling variations, units of measurement, or locale-specific terms.

Classifier: The question asks for the best unit of measurement for the mass of garbage collected from a city. The current options are metric (Grams, Kilograms, Tonnes, Milligrams). In a US context, these should be converted to US Customary units (e.g., Ounces, Pounds, Tons). This is a simple unit conversion/localization of the answer set and prompt context. Additionally, "Tonnes" is the metric spelling; the US uses "Tons" for the customary unit.

Verifier: The question asks for the appropriate unit of mass for a large-scale context (city garbage). The options are currently metric (Grams, Kilograms, Tonnes, Milligrams). Localizing this for a US context involves replacing these with US Customary units (e.g., Ounces, Pounds, Tons). This is a simple unit localization with no complex math or interlinked values.

Classifier: The text "The graph of a linear equation is a straight line" uses standard mathematical terminology that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations, units, or locale-specific terms present.

Verifier: The text "The graph of a linear equation is a straight line" consists of universal mathematical terminology. There are no spelling differences (e.g., "linear", "equation", "straight", "line" are identical in US and AU English), no units, and no locale-specific pedagogical terms. The primary classifier's assessment is correct.

Classifier: The text discusses abstract mathematical concepts (matrix multiplication and function composition) using terminology that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations (e.g., "transformation" is the same), no units, and no locale-specific pedagogical contexts.

Verifier: The text describes abstract mathematical properties of matrix multiplication and function composition. The terminology used ("matrix", "multiplication", "transformations", "composition", "vector") is identical in US and Australian English. There are no spelling variations, units, or locale-specific pedagogical terms present.

Classifier: The text uses neutral, bi-dialect terminology. There are no AU-specific spellings, metric units, or school-context terms (like 'year level' or 'maths'). The concept of counting 'across and up' on a grid is universal.

Verifier: The text is generic and does not contain any locale-specific spelling, terminology, or units. It is suitable for both US and AU English without modification.

Classifier: The text uses standard geometric terminology ("net", "pyramid", "vertex", "faces") that is identical in both Australian and American English. There are no spelling differences (e.g., -ise/-ize, -our/-or) or units of measurement involved.

Verifier: The text consists of standard geometric terminology ("net", "pyramid", "vertex", "faces") that is identical in both US and AU English. There are no spelling variations, units of measurement, or locale-specific pedagogical terms present.

Classifier: The text discusses metric units of mass (grams, kilograms, tonnes) in a conceptual context. For US localization, "tonnes" (metric tons) should be localized to "tons" or the discussion should include US customary units (ounces, pounds, tons) to be relevant to a US student's pedagogical context.

Verifier: The classifier correctly identified that the text uses metric units (grams, kilograms, tonnes) in a conceptual explanation. For US localization, these units should be replaced or supplemented with US customary units (ounces, pounds, tons) to maintain pedagogical relevance. Since there are no specific numeric values to calculate or convert, "RED.units_textual_conversion" is the correct category.

Classifier: The text uses standard mathematical terminology ("cubic function", "graph", "equation") and notation that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no units, regional spellings, or school-system-specific terms present.

Verifier: The content consists of a standard mathematical problem involving a cubic function and coordinate points. The terminology ("graph", "cubic function", "equation") and notation are universal across English-speaking locales (US and AU). There are no regional spellings, units, or school-system-specific terms that require localization.

Classifier: The content contains the Australian spelling "centre" in the answer choices, which needs to be localized to the US spelling "center". The question text itself is neutral.

Verifier: The answer choice "centre" is the Australian/British spelling and needs to be localized to the US spelling "center". This is a straightforward spelling-only change.

Classifier: The text uses standard geometric terminology (rectangles, circles, composite shape) that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations (e.g., "centre"), units of measurement, or school-specific context terms present.

Verifier: The text consists of standard geometric terminology ("rectangles", "circles", "composite shape") that is identical in both US and Australian English. There are no spelling variations, units of measurement, or locale-specific pedagogical terms present.

Classifier: The text uses neutral mathematical terminology ("growing pattern", "stage number", "rule", "growth rate") that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling differences, unit measurements, or locale-specific educational terms present.

Verifier: The text consists of universal mathematical concepts and terminology ("growing pattern", "stage number", "growth rate") that are identical in both US and Australian English. There are no spelling variations, units of measurement, or locale-specific educational terms present.

Classifier: The content consists of standard geometric terminology (polygon, hexagon, pentagon, octagon, heptagon) and basic English that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no units, regional spellings, or locale-specific contexts present.

Verifier: The content consists of standard geometric terms (polygon, hexagon, pentagon, octagon, heptagon) and basic English syntax that is identical in both US and Australian English. There are no units, regional spellings, or locale-specific contexts that require localization.

Classifier: The text defines a "unit cube" using standard mathematical terminology that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations (e.g., "metre"), no specific units (it uses the generic "unit"), and no school-context terminology that differs between the locales.

Verifier: The content defines a "unit cube" using generic mathematical terminology. There are no spelling differences (e.g., "meter" vs "metre"), no specific measurement units to convert, and no school-system specific terminology. The text is identical in both US and Australian English.

Classifier: The text "Creating tables of values helps in understanding the between variables" and the associated mathematical terms (difference, product, sum, relationship) are bi-dialect neutral. There are no AU-specific spellings, units, or terminology present.

Verifier: The text and mathematical terms (difference, product, sum, relationship) are spelled identically in US and AU English. There are no units, school-specific terminology, or locale-specific references present.

Classifier: The text uses standard geometric terminology ("basic shapes", "composite shapes") that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations, units, or locale-specific contexts present.

Verifier: The text consists of standard geometric terminology ("basic shapes", "composite shapes") that is identical in both US and Australian English. There are no spelling differences, units, or locale-specific pedagogical contexts that require localization.

Classifier: The text uses standard mathematical terminology ("slope", "y-intercept") and the slope-intercept form equation. While the US often uses $y=mx+b$ and AU often uses $y=mx+c$, both are mathematically valid and understood in both locales. The term "slope" is used instead of the more British/Australian "gradient", making it already aligned with US conventions. No AU-specific spelling or units are present.

Verifier: The primary classifier incorrectly states that the text uses "slope" and "y=mx+b". The source text actually uses "y=mx+c" and the term "slope". In Australian English (AU), "gradient" is the standard pedagogical term used in schools rather than "slope". While "y=mx+c" is the standard AU form (unlike the US "y=mx+b"), the use of "slope" represents a terminology mismatch for the target locale's educational standards. This falls under a style/tone/locale shift or terminology adjustment for the specific educational context.

Classifier: The text defines a mathematical/visual concept using standard English terminology ("rows and columns", "objects or numbers") that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations (e.g., "colour"), no metric units, and no school-system specific terms.

Verifier: The text "A visual arrangement of objects or numbers in rows and columns" uses standard mathematical terminology that is identical in US and Australian English. There are no spelling differences, units, or locale-specific pedagogical terms present in the question or the answer choices (graph, table, grid, chart).

Classifier: The term "stem-and-leaf plot" is the standard mathematical terminology used in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations, units, or locale-specific references in the question or the answer choices.

Verifier: The term "stem-and-leaf plot" is standard mathematical terminology in both US and Australian English. There are no spelling variations, units, or locale-specific references in the text or answer choices.

Classifier: The text uses universal geometric terminology (triangle, rectangle, parallelogram, area) and standard English spelling common to both AU and US dialects. There are no units, specific cultural references, or spelling variations (like 'centre' or 'colour') present.

Verifier: The text consists of universal geometric concepts and standard English vocabulary that is identical in both US and AU/UK dialects. There are no units, spelling variations, or cultural references requiring localization.

Classifier: The text uses standard statistical terminology ("bar chart", "mode", "category") and general vocabulary that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling differences, unit measurements, or locale-specific pedagogical terms present.

Verifier: The text uses universal statistical terminology ("bar chart", "mode", "category") and standard English vocabulary that is identical in both US and Australian English. There are no spelling variations, units of measurement, or locale-specific pedagogical terms.

Classifier: The content uses standard geometric terminology (polygon, square, triangle, pentagon, circle) that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no units, spellings, or school-context terms requiring localization.

Verifier: The content consists of standard geometric terms (polygon, square, triangle, pentagon, circle) that are identical in US and Australian English. There are no units, spellings, or school-specific contexts that require localization.

Classifier: The text uses standard statistical terminology (median, quartiles, data spread) that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations, units, or locale-specific contexts present.

Verifier: The text consists of universal statistical terminology ("quartiles", "median", "data spread") that does not vary between US and Australian English. There are no spelling differences, units, or locale-specific references.

Classifier: The term "Anti-clockwise" is the standard Australian/British spelling and terminology. In US English, the standard term is "Counterclockwise". This requires a spelling/terminology localization shift.

Verifier: The term "Anti-clockwise" is the standard British/Australian English term, whereas "Counterclockwise" is used in US English. This is a standard spelling/terminology localization requirement.

Classifier: The text uses standard geometric terminology ("central angle", "subtended", "circumference") and notation (degrees) that are identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations (like "centre") or locale-specific units present.

Verifier: The text uses standard mathematical terminology ("central angle", "subtended", "circumference") and notation (degrees) that are identical in both US and Australian English. There are no spelling variations (e.g., "center" vs "centre") or locale-specific units present in the source text.

Classifier: The text uses standard geometric terminology ("central angle", "subtended", "arc", "circumference") that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no units of measurement other than degrees, which are universal, and no region-specific spellings or contexts.

Verifier: The text uses universal mathematical terminology ("central angle", "subtended", "arc", "circumference") and degrees as the unit of measurement. There are no spelling differences (e.g., "center" vs "centre" is not present) or region-specific contexts. The classification as GREEN.truly_unchanged is correct.

Classifier: The text uses universal mathematical terminology ("number line", "fractions", "whole numbers") and standard US/AU spelling. There are no units, locale-specific terms, or spelling differences present.

Verifier: The content consists of universal mathematical concepts (number lines, fractions, whole numbers) and standard spelling shared between US and AU English. There are no units, locale-specific terminology, or spelling variations requiring localization.

Classifier: The text uses standard statistical terminology ("back-to-back stem plots", "variable association") that is common to both Australian and US English. There are no spelling differences (e.g., "association" is the same in both), no units, and no locale-specific pedagogical terms.

Verifier: The text consists of standard statistical terminology ("back-to-back stem plots", "variable association") that is identical in both US and Australian English. There are no spelling variations, units, or locale-specific pedagogical terms present.

Classifier: The text discusses probability concepts (dependent and independent events) using standard English terminology that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations, units, or locale-specific contexts present.

Verifier: The text consists of a conceptual question and answer regarding probability (dependent and independent events). The terminology used is standard across English dialects, and there are no spelling variations, units, or locale-specific references that require localization.

Classifier: The content discusses the unit circle and angle measures in degrees. These are universal mathematical concepts and notations used identically in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations, unit conversions, or locale-specific terminology present.

Verifier: The content involves the unit circle and angle measurements in degrees. These are universal mathematical concepts and notations that do not vary between US and Australian English. There are no spelling differences, unit conversions, or locale-specific terms.

Classifier: The term "truncus" is a specific mathematical name used in the Australian curriculum (particularly in Victoria's VCE) to describe functions of the form y = a/(x-h)^2 + k. This terminology is not used in the United States, where such a function would simply be called a "rational function" or described by its equation without a specific name.

Verifier: The classifier correctly identified that the term "truncus" is specific to the Australian (specifically Victorian VCE) mathematics curriculum. In the US and other locales, this function is referred to as a rational function or by its equation, and the term "truncus" would be unfamiliar to students. This requires localization to a more general or locale-appropriate term.

Classifier: The text uses standard mathematical terminology (unit squares, perimeter, rectangle, length, edges) that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations or specific units of measurement that require localization.

Verifier: The text uses standard mathematical terminology and spelling that is identical in both US and Australian English. There are no specific units of measurement or locale-specific terms that require localization.

Classifier: The text consists of simple, universal English vocabulary and grammar. There are no regional spelling variations, metric units, or locale-specific terminology present in either the question or the answer.

Verifier: The text uses universal English vocabulary and grammar with no regional spelling variations, units of measurement, or locale-specific terminology. The classification of GREEN.truly_unchanged is correct.

Classifier: The text uses universal mathematical terminology ("number line") and standard English vocabulary that is identical in both Australian and American English. There are no spelling variations, units, or locale-specific pedagogical terms present.

Verifier: The text "Why do we need to make the spaces the same when we put numbers on a number line?" and the answer "If the spaces are the same, the numbers are in the right places." contain no locale-specific spelling, terminology, or units. The language is identical in US and AU English.

Classifier: The text uses standard mathematical terminology (face, edges, planar graph, region, vertex) that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no units, spellings, or cultural references requiring localization.

Verifier: The content consists of standard mathematical terminology (face, edges, planar graph, region, vertex, line, point) that is identical in both US and Australian English. There are no spelling variations, units, or cultural contexts that require localization.

Classifier: The terminology used ("horizontal arrangement", "array", "row", "column", "line", "grid") is standard mathematical and English terminology used identically in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling differences, unit conversions, or school-context specific terms required.

Verifier: The content uses standard mathematical terminology ("horizontal arrangement", "array", "row", "column", "line", "grid") that is identical in US and Australian English. There are no spelling variations, unit conversions, or locale-specific pedagogical terms required.

Classifier: The text uses standard mathematical and pedagogical terminology (stages, visual patterns, rule, formula, predict) that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling differences, metric units, or locale-specific terms present.

Verifier: The text consists of standard mathematical and pedagogical language that is identical in both US and Australian English. There are no spelling variations, units of measurement, or locale-specific terminology present.

Classifier: The text discusses graph theory and network definitions using standard mathematical terminology that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations (e.g., "modeling" vs "modelling" is not present, though "model" is used), no units of measurement, and no locale-specific educational context.

Verifier: The text uses standard mathematical terminology for graph theory (network, graph, edges, weights, vertices) which is identical in US and Australian English. There are no spelling differences, units of measurement, or locale-specific educational references.

Classifier: The text discusses Venn diagrams and set theory using standard mathematical terminology that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations, units, or locale-specific contexts present.

Verifier: The text uses universal mathematical terminology (Venn diagram, sets, pairwise) that is identical in both US and Australian English. There are no spelling variations, units, or locale-specific references.

Classifier: The text discusses geometric properties (interior angle sums of polygons) using terminology that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations (e.g., "centre"), no units of measurement, and no school-context terms (e.g., "Year 10").

Verifier: The text discusses geometric properties of polygons. The terminology used ("interior angle sum", "polygon", "triangles") is universal across English locales. There are no spelling differences (e.g., "center" vs "centre"), no units of measurement, and no school-system specific terminology.

Classifier: The text uses universal statistical terminology ("histograms", "data", "interval sizes", "bin widths") that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations, units, or locale-specific contexts present.

Verifier: The text "Why might two histograms that are based on the same data look different?" and the answer "Different interval sizes (bin widths) can group the data in different ways." contain no locale-specific spelling, terminology, or units. The terminology used is standard across all English dialects.

Classifier: The text uses standard geometric terminology ("polygon", "triangles", "interior angles", "vertex") that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling differences (e.g., "center" vs "centre") or unit systems involved.

Verifier: The text consists of standard geometric terminology ("polygon", "triangles", "interior angles", "vertex") and mathematical notation ($180^\circ$) that is identical in both US and Australian English. There are no spelling variations, unit conversions, or locale-specific pedagogical differences required.

Classifier: The text discusses statistical concepts (stem-and-leaf plots, medians, quartiles) using terminology that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling differences (e.g., "quartiles", "median", "values" are universal), no units, and no locale-specific pedagogical terms.

Verifier: The text uses universal statistical terminology (median, quartiles, stem-and-leaf plots) that is identical in US and Australian English. There are no spelling differences, units, or locale-specific pedagogical references.

Classifier: The text discusses the general mathematical convention for coordinate pairs (x, y). The terminology used ("across number", "up number") is descriptive and neutral, containing no AU-specific spellings, metric units, or region-specific educational terminology.

Verifier: The text explains a universal mathematical convention regarding coordinate pairs. It contains no region-specific spelling, units, or terminology that would require localization for the Australian context.

Classifier: The text discusses matrix transformations (reflection and dilation) using standard mathematical terminology that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no units, locale-specific spellings, or pedagogical terms that require localization.

Verifier: The content consists of standard mathematical terminology regarding matrix transformations (reflection, dilation, multiplication order) that is identical in both US and Australian English. There are no spelling differences, units, or locale-specific pedagogical terms present.

Classifier: The question asks for the most appropriate unit to measure the mass of a grain of sand. The answer choices are all metric units (t, mg, g, kg). In a US context, while customary units (ounces) exist, science and math pedagogy often requires students to identify appropriate metric prefixes. Converting this to US customary units (e.g., fractions of an ounce) would likely invalidate the pedagogical intent of the question, which is to test understanding of metric scale. Therefore, it should likely stay metric, but since it involves unit selection, it falls under the GRAY category for pedagogical metric preservation.

Verifier: The primary classifier correctly identified that this question is designed to test the student's understanding of metric prefixes and scale (milligrams vs grams vs kilograms). Converting these units to US Customary (e.g., ounces) would destroy the pedagogical purpose of the question, which is specifically about metric estimation. Therefore, it should remain metric, and the GRAY.metric_pedagogy_should_stay_metric classification is appropriate.

Classifier: The text uses universal mathematical terminology ("visual patterns", "table of values", "numerical relationship") that is identical in both Australian and American English. There are no units, region-specific spellings, or localized educational terms present.

Verifier: The text consists of universal mathematical concepts and vocabulary. There are no regional spelling variations, units of measurement, or localized educational terminology that would require adjustment between US and Australian English.

Classifier: The text uses universal currency symbols ($) and neutral terminology ("box of pencils", "school", "spend"). There are no AU-specific spellings, metric units, or locale-specific educational terms that require adjustment for a US audience.

Verifier: The text uses universal currency symbols ($) and neutral terminology ("box of pencils", "school", "spend"). There are no AU-specific spellings, metric units, or locale-specific educational terms that require adjustment for a US audience.

Classifier: The text "A polygon can have curved sides" uses standard geometric terminology and spelling that is identical in both Australian and American English. There are no units, school-level indicators, or dialect-specific terms present.

Verifier: The text "A polygon can have curved sides" consists of universal mathematical terminology and standard English spelling shared by both US and AU locales. No localization is required.

Classifier: The text discusses mathematical concepts (percentages, fractions, decimals) and a 10x10 grid. There are no AU-specific spellings, terminology, or units present. The language is bi-dialect neutral.

Verifier: The text consists of universal mathematical concepts (percentages, fractions, decimals, 10x10 grids) and standard English terminology that is identical in both US and AU/UK dialects. There are no units, specific spellings, or localized terminology requiring change.

Classifier: The content uses standard geometric terminology (square, angles, acute, reflex, right, obtuse) that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no units, spellings, or cultural references that require localization.

Verifier: The content consists of standard geometric terms (square, angles, acute, reflex, right, obtuse) that are spelled and used identically in both Australian and US English. There are no units, cultural references, or locale-specific spellings present.

Classifier: The text discusses the conceptual definition of unit squares in area measurement. It uses bi-dialect neutral terminology and contains no AU-specific spellings, units, or cultural references.

Verifier: The text explains a universal mathematical concept (unit squares in area measurement) using neutral terminology. There are no spelling differences, units of measurement, or cultural references that require localization for an Australian audience.

Classifier: The text uses universal mathematical terminology (edge weights, network, paths) and standard English spelling that is identical in both Australian and American English. There are no units, locale-specific terms, or spelling variations present.

Verifier: The text consists of universal mathematical concepts (networks, edge weights, paths) and standard English vocabulary that is identical in both US and AU/UK locales. There are no units, spelling variations, or locale-specific pedagogical terms present.

Classifier: The text uses universal mathematical terminology ("skip count", "intervals", "patterns") that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations, units, or locale-specific contexts present.

Verifier: The text "Why is it important to know how many we add each time when we skip count?" and the associated hint and answer contain no locale-specific spelling, terminology, or units. The mathematical concept of skip counting is universal across English locales.

Classifier: The text uses universal mathematical terminology ("skip counting") and contains no AU-specific spellings, units, or cultural references. It is bi-dialect neutral.

Verifier: The content consists of a universal mathematical concept (skip counting) and basic arithmetic. There are no regional spellings, units, or cultural references that require localization for Australia. The text is bi-dialect neutral.

Classifier: The text uses standard mathematical terminology (bounded regions, graph, face count) that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations, units, or locale-specific contexts present.

Verifier: The text uses universal mathematical terminology (bounded regions, graph, face count) that is identical in both US and Australian English. There are no spelling variations, units, or locale-specific contexts.

Classifier: The term "trapezium" is used in the answer set. In Australian English (and British English), a "trapezium" refers to a quadrilateral with at least one pair of parallel sides (or sometimes exactly one pair depending on the curriculum), whereas in US English, this shape is called a "trapezoid". While the correct answer to the specific prompt provided is "rectangle", the presence of "trapezium" in the distractor set requires localization to "trapezoid" for a US audience to maintain terminology consistency.

Verifier: The primary classifier correctly identified that "trapezium" is a British/Australian English term for a quadrilateral that is referred to as a "trapezoid" in US English. Since the target audience is US-based, this terminology requires localization to ensure consistency with the US school context, even though it is a distractor in this specific question.

Classifier: The text uses standard mathematical terminology ("bar chart", "table") and neutral spelling that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no units, locale-specific terms, or pedagogical differences requiring localization.

Verifier: The text consists of standard mathematical terminology ("bar chart", "table") and general vocabulary that is spelled identically in US and Australian English. There are no units, cultural references, or locale-specific pedagogical differences present.

Classifier: The text describes a geometric property of a parallelogram using terminology that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling differences (e.g., "parallelogram" is spelled the same), no units of measurement, and no locale-specific educational terms.

Verifier: The text uses standard geometric terminology ("parallelogram", "triangle", "parallel") that is identical in both US and Australian English. There are no spelling variations, units of measurement, or locale-specific educational references.

Classifier: The text uses universal mathematical terminology ("Venn diagram") and standard English vocabulary that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations (e.g., -ise/-ize), no metric units, and no school-context terms.

Verifier: The text consists of universal mathematical terminology and standard English vocabulary that does not vary between US and Australian English. There are no spelling differences, units, or school-system specific terms.

Classifier: The content consists of a standard geometry question about a hexagon and its interior angles. The terminology ("hexagon", "interior angles") and the number words ("six", "five", "four", "seven") are identical in both Australian and US English. There are no units, locale-specific spellings, or cultural references present.

Verifier: The content is a basic geometry question about the number of interior angles in a hexagon. The terminology ("hexagon", "interior angles") and the number words ("four", "five", "six", "seven") are identical in both US and Australian English. There are no units, locale-specific spellings, or cultural references that require localization.

Classifier: The text uses simple, bi-dialect neutral language to describe a mathematical concept (slope/rate of change on a graph). There are no AU-specific spellings, units, or terminology present.

Verifier: The text describes a mathematical concept (slope/rate of change) using neutral language. There are no spellings, units, or terms that require localization from US to AU English.

Classifier: The text uses neutral, bi-dialect terminology. There are no AU-specific spellings, metric units, or school-context terms that require localization for a US audience. The concept of "unit cubes" and "layers" is standard in both AU and US mathematics curricula for volume.

Verifier: The text is mathematically neutral and uses terminology ("volume", "layers", "unit cubes") that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling differences, metric units requiring conversion, or school-system specific terms.

Classifier: The text uses universally neutral mathematical terminology and standard English vocabulary that is identical in both Australian and American English. There are no units, regional spellings, or locale-specific terms present.

Verifier: The text consists of universal mathematical concepts and standard English vocabulary that is identical in both US and AU/UK English. There are no regional spellings, units, or locale-specific terms.

Classifier: The text uses standard mathematical terminology (independent, dependent, conditional, inclusive, exclusive) that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no units, spellings, or school-context terms requiring localization.

Verifier: The content consists of standard mathematical terminology (independent, dependent, conditional, inclusive, exclusive) that is identical in both US and Australian English. There are no spelling differences, units, or locale-specific contexts present.

Classifier: The text uses standard mathematical terminology ("perimeter", "unit squares", "distance") that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling differences, regional terms, or specific metric units that require conversion.

Verifier: The text consists of standard mathematical concepts (perimeter, unit squares, distance) that are identical in US and Australian English. There are no spelling variations (e.g., "meter" vs "metre" is not present, only "perimeter"), no regional terminology, and no specific units requiring conversion.

Classifier: The text uses standard geometric terminology ("central angle", "subtended", "arc", "circumference") that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no units of measurement other than degrees, which are universal, and no region-specific spellings or contexts.

Verifier: The text uses universal geometric terminology and notation. There are no region-specific spellings, units, or cultural contexts that require localization between US and Australian English.

Classifier: The text uses standard graph theory terminology (circuit, cycle, vertices, edges) which is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations, units, or locale-specific contexts present.

Verifier: The text consists of standard mathematical terminology (circuit, cycle, vertices, edges) that is identical in both US and Australian English. There are no spelling variations, units, or locale-specific pedagogical contexts that require localization.

Classifier: The text uses universal mathematical concepts (counting by 10s) and contains no AU-specific spelling, terminology, or units. It is bi-dialect neutral.

Verifier: The content consists of universal mathematical logic (counting by 10s) and contains no spelling, terminology, or units that require localization for the Australian context.

Classifier: The text contains the metric unit 'kilometre' (AU spelling) and describes a linear relationship with a cap. There are only three numeric values involved in the logic ($10, $2, $50) and the distance calculation (20 km). Converting 'kilometre' to 'mile' is a simple unit swap that does not require re-deriving complex mathematical functions, although the numeric value '20' in the coordinate (20, 50) would need to be updated to reflect the new unit if the rate per mile is adjusted, or the rate per mile would need to be calculated to keep the coordinates the same. Given the simplicity of the linear model, this falls under simple conversion.

Verifier: The primary classifier identified this as a simple conversion, but according to Decision Rule 5, this should be classified as RED.units_complex_keep_metric. The problem involves coordinate geometry (points (0,10) and (20,50)) and a linear function definition ($10 + 2d$). Converting 'kilometre' to 'mile' would require re-calculating the slope of the line and the x-coordinate of the vertex where the cap is reached (20 km would become 12.427 miles), which involves re-deriving the mathematical constraints of the graph.

Classifier: The text uses standard graph theory terminology (path, walk, vertices) which is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations, units, or locale-specific contexts present.

Verifier: The text uses universal mathematical terminology (graph theory: path, walk, vertices) that is identical in US and Australian English. There are no spelling differences, units, or locale-specific references.

Classifier: The text is bi-dialect neutral. It contains no AU-specific spellings, terminology, or units. The concept of "checking your work" in multiplication is universal across AU and US English.

Verifier: The text is neutral and contains no spelling, terminology, or unit-based differences between US and AU English. The concept of checking work in mathematics is universal.

Classifier: The text uses standard geometric terminology (net, prism, pyramid, faces, edges) that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling differences (e.g., "centre" vs "center"), no units, and no locale-specific pedagogical terms.

Verifier: The text consists of standard geometric terminology (net, prism, pyramid, faces, edges) that is identical in both US and Australian English. There are no spelling variations (e.g., "center" vs "centre"), no units of measurement, and no locale-specific pedagogical references.

Classifier: The text contains the Australian spelling "centre", which needs to be localized to the US spelling "center". No other terminology or unit changes are required.

Verifier: The text contains the word "centre", which is the Australian/British spelling. In a US context, this should be localized to "center". No other terminology, units, or context-specific changes are necessary.

Classifier: The text uses universal geographic terminology (cardinal directions N, S, E, W) and standard English spelling common to both AU and US locales. There are no metric units, school-specific terms, or regional idioms present.

Verifier: The text consists of universal geographic concepts and standard English spelling that is identical in both US and AU locales. There are no units, regional terminology, or school-specific contexts that require localization.

Classifier: The text uses universal mathematical concepts and neutral English terminology. There are no AU-specific spellings, units, or cultural references. The phrasing "counting by 10s" is standard in both AU and US English.

Verifier: The text uses universal mathematical concepts and neutral English terminology. There are no AU-specific spellings, units, or cultural references. The phrasing "counting by 10s" is standard in both AU and US English.

Classifier: The problem involves a simple geometric calculation with a small number of unit-bearing values (side lengths 3 and 5). Converting these to inches is a straightforward substitution that does not require re-deriving complex mathematical functions or relationships. The answer is a single numeric value that would scale simply with the unit change.

Verifier: The problem involves a simple geometric calculation (surface area of two stacked cubes) with only two unit-bearing values (3 and 5). Converting these from cm to inches is a straightforward substitution that does not require re-deriving complex mathematical functions or handling interlinked variables. The answer is a single numeric value that scales linearly with the unit change. This fits the definition of RED.units_simple_conversion.

Classifier: The text is bi-dialect neutral. It uses basic mathematical concepts ("total", "groups", "joined") that are identical in Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations, units, or locale-specific terms.

Verifier: The text is bi-dialect neutral. It uses basic mathematical concepts ("total", "groups", "joined") that are identical in Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations, units, or locale-specific terms.

Classifier: The text uses standard geometric terminology (quadrilateral, inscribed, circle, opposite angles, arcs, subtended, vertices) that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no units other than degrees, and no region-specific spellings or conventions present.

Verifier: The text consists of geometric principles regarding cyclic quadrilaterals. The terminology ("quadrilateral", "inscribed", "subtended", "vertices") and the mathematical notation (degrees) are universal across English locales. There are no region-specific spellings or units requiring localization.

Classifier: The term "anticlockwise" is the standard Australian/British term. In US English, "counterclockwise" is the standard term. This requires a spelling/terminology localization.

Verifier: The term "anticlockwise" is the standard British/Australian English term, whereas "counterclockwise" is used in US English. This is a standard lexical/spelling localization requirement.

Classifier: The text uses the term "trapeziums". In Australian (and British) English, a "trapezium" is a quadrilateral with one pair of parallel sides. In US English, this shape is called a "trapezoid". This is a standard terminology difference in school mathematics.

Verifier: The classifier correctly identified the term "trapeziums". In Australian and British English, "trapezium" refers to the shape known as a "trapezoid" in US English. This is a specific terminology difference within a school mathematics context.

Classifier: The text uses universal geometric terminology (parallelogram, rectangle, area) and contains no AU-specific spellings, units, or cultural references. It is bi-dialect neutral.

Verifier: The text consists of universal geometric concepts (parallelogram, rectangle, area) and standard English vocabulary. There are no region-specific spellings (e.g., "color" vs "colour"), no units of measurement, and no cultural or educational system references that require localization for an Australian context.

Classifier: The text discusses mathematical constants (pi), degrees, and the unit circle. These concepts and their terminology ("circumference", "radians", "rotation") are identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling differences (e.g., "centre" vs "center") or locale-specific units present.

Verifier: The text contains mathematical concepts (pi, degrees, unit circle, circumference, radians) that are universal and use identical terminology and spelling in both US and Australian English. There are no locale-specific units or spelling variations (like "center/centre") present in the source text.

Classifier: The text uses standard graph theory terminology (walks, trails, paths, cycles) and general transport vocabulary that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling differences, unit measurements, or locale-specific educational contexts present.

Verifier: The text consists of standard graph theory terminology and general transport vocabulary. There are no spelling differences (e.g., "transport" is universal), no units of measurement, and no locale-specific educational references. The classification as GREEN.truly_unchanged is correct.

Classifier: The text uses standard mathematical terminology (Venn diagram, sets, elements, circles, rectangle) that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations (e.g., "centre"), units, or locale-specific contexts present.

Verifier: The text consists of standard mathematical terminology for set theory (Venn diagram, elements, sets, circles, rectangle) which is identical in US and Australian English. There are no spelling variations, units, or locale-specific pedagogical differences.

Classifier: The text is bi-dialect neutral. It uses standard mathematical terminology ("x and y tables", "variables", "patterns") and general phrasing ("real-world problems", "everyday problems") that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling differences, units, or school-system-specific terms.

Verifier: The text is bi-dialect neutral. It uses standard mathematical terminology ("x and y tables", "variables", "patterns") and general phrasing ("real-world problems", "everyday problems") that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling differences, units, or school-system-specific terms.

Classifier: The text uses standard statistical terminology ("histogram", "continuous", "intervals") that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations, units, or locale-specific contexts present.

Verifier: The text consists of standard statistical terminology ("histogram", "continuous", "intervals") that is identical in both US and Australian English. There are no spelling differences, units of measurement, or locale-specific educational contexts that require localization.

Classifier: The text "Angles of the same magnitude are" and the corresponding answer choices ("lines", "proportional", "similar", "equal") use standard mathematical terminology that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations (e.g., "centre"), no metric units, and no locale-specific educational terms.

Verifier: The text "Angles of the same magnitude are" and the answer choices "lines", "proportional", "similar", and "equal" use universal mathematical terminology. There are no spelling differences, unit conversions, or locale-specific educational terms required for localization between US and Australian English.

Classifier: The question contains a single unit-bearing value (10 cm) and a unit-bearing suffix (cm^2). This is a simple geometric problem where the units can be converted to US customary (inches) without complex mathematical re-derivation. The answer is a single numeric value that would scale linearly with the unit change.

Verifier: The question involves a single unit-bearing value (10 cm) in a simple geometric context (surface area of joined cubes). Converting this to US customary units (e.g., inches) is a straightforward linear scaling of the input and a corresponding scaling of the output (1000 cm^2). There are no complex equations, interlinked values, or pedagogical reasons to keep it in metric.

Classifier: The terminology used ("fraction", "numerator", "denominator", "divisor", "factor") is standard mathematical English used identically in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations (e.g., -ise/-ize) or unit conversions required.

Verifier: The content consists of standard mathematical terminology ("fraction", "numerator", "denominator", "divisor", "factor") that is identical in both US and Australian English. There are no spelling variations, units, or cultural references requiring localization.

Classifier: The text "A kite is a closed shape" uses standard geometric terminology that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no units, spellings, or cultural references requiring localization.

Verifier: The text "True or false: A kite is a closed shape." uses universal geometric terminology and standard English spelling shared by both US and AU locales. No localization is required.

Classifier: The text uses universal mathematical terminology and concepts (number line, wholes, fractions) that are identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations, unit measurements, or locale-specific educational terms present.

Verifier: The content consists of universal mathematical concepts (number lines, fractions, wholes) and standard English vocabulary that does not vary between US and Australian English. There are no units, locale-specific spellings, or educational terminology requiring localization.

Classifier: The text describes a fundamental mathematical concept (linearity) using terminology that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no units, region-specific spellings, or school-context terms present.

Verifier: The text describes a universal mathematical concept (linearity) using standard terminology that is identical in both US and Australian English. There are no units, region-specific spellings, or school-system specific terms.

Classifier: The text discusses geometric principles (area of a triangle) using terminology that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no units, spellings, or cultural references that require localization.

Verifier: The text describes a universal geometric principle using terminology that is identical in both US and Australian English. There are no units, locale-specific spellings, or cultural references present.

Classifier: The text uses universal mathematical terminology (fraction, decimal, percentage, grid, squares) that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations (e.g., "percentage" is standard in both), no units, and no locale-specific pedagogical terms.

Verifier: The text consists of universal mathematical concepts (fraction, decimal, percentage, grid) and standard English vocabulary that is identical in both US and Australian English. There are no spelling variations, units, or locale-specific pedagogical terms present.

Classifier: The text uses standard geometric terminology ("3D shape", "2D faces", "solid shape", "face") that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no regional spelling variations, units of measurement, or school-context-specific terms that require localization.

Verifier: The text consists of standard geometric terminology ("3D shape", "2D faces", "solid shape", "face") that is identical in both US and Australian English. There are no spelling differences, units of measurement, or regional pedagogical terms present.

Classifier: The text is bi-dialect neutral. It discusses general measurement principles ("smallest markings on a scale", "measure more accurately") without referencing specific units (metric or imperial), AU-specific spellings, or localized terminology.

Verifier: The text is conceptually neutral and does not contain any specific units, regional spellings, or localized terminology. It describes a general principle of measurement applicable in any locale.

Classifier: The text uses standard geometric terminology (triangle, parallelogram, rectangle, area) that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no units, spellings, or cultural references that require localization.

Verifier: The text consists of standard geometric concepts (triangle, parallelogram, rectangle, area) that are identical in US and Australian English. There are no spelling differences, units, or cultural references present in either the question or the answer.

Classifier: The text discusses geometric definitions using standard English and mathematical terminology that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no units, regional spellings, or school-system-specific terms.

Verifier: The text consists of universal mathematical terminology ("hexagon", "sides") and standard English vocabulary that is identical in both US and Australian English. There are no units, regional spellings, or locale-specific educational terms.

Classifier: The content consists of basic geometric properties and terms ("square", "sides", "parallel", "equal", "similar", "unequal") that are identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations (e.g., "equal" is universal), no units, and no locale-specific context.

Verifier: The content consists of basic geometric properties ("square", "sides", "parallel", "equal", "similar", "unequal") that are identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations, units, or locale-specific contexts present in the source text.

Classifier: The text uses standard geometric terminology ("cyclic quadrilateral", "measure of angle") and mathematical notation that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no units (other than degrees, which are universal), no regional spellings, and no locale-specific context.

Verifier: The text consists of standard mathematical terminology ("cyclic quadrilateral", "measure of angle") and LaTeX notation that is identical in both US and Australian English. There are no regional spellings, units requiring conversion (degrees are universal), or locale-specific contexts.

Classifier: The text uses standard mathematical terminology ("sine rule", "triangulation", "non-included angle") that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no units, region-specific spellings, or curriculum-specific terms that require localization.

Verifier: The text uses universal mathematical terminology ("sine rule", "triangulation", "non-included angle") that is identical in both US and Australian English. There are no spelling differences, units, or region-specific pedagogical terms present.

Classifier: The text uses standard graph theory terminology ("vertex", "path", "closed path") which is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations (e.g., "centre"), no metric units, and no locale-specific educational context.

Verifier: The text consists of standard mathematical terminology ("vertex", "path", "closed path") that is identical in US and Australian English. There are no spelling variations, units, or locale-specific educational references.

Classifier: The text discusses general mathematical concepts (patterns in x and y values, graph behavior) using terminology that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations, units, or locale-specific educational terms present.

Verifier: The text consists of general mathematical descriptions that do not contain any locale-specific spelling, terminology, or units. The language is identical in both US and Australian English.

Classifier: The text uses universal mathematical and scientific terminology ("time", "distance", "negative values", "graph") that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no units, spellings, or cultural contexts that require localization.

Verifier: The text "Why might a graph involving time or distance not include negative values?" and the corresponding answer use universal mathematical terminology. There are no spelling differences (e.g., "meter" vs "metre" is not present), no specific units to convert, and no cultural or pedagogical contexts that differ between US and Australian English.

Classifier: The text discusses a fundamental mathematical concept (fractions and wholes) using language that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations, unit measurements, or region-specific terminology present.

Verifier: The text describes a universal mathematical concept regarding fractions and wholes. There are no region-specific spellings, units of measurement, or curriculum-specific terminology that would require localization between US and Australian English.

Classifier: The text uses universal geometric terminology ("sphere", "edges", "corners", "round") that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no units, spelling variations (like 'centre'), or school-context terms requiring localization.

Verifier: The text consists of universal geometric descriptions. There are no spelling differences (e.g., "center" vs "centre"), no units, and no locale-specific terminology. The classification as GREEN.truly_unchanged is correct.

Classifier: The text defines a mathematical term (fraction) using standard, bi-dialect neutral terminology. There are no AU-specific spellings, units, or school-context terms present.

Verifier: The content consists of a standard mathematical definition for a "fraction". The terminology used ("part of a whole", "number over another") is universal across English dialects, including US and AU. There are no spelling differences, unit conversions, or school-system specific terms required.

Classifier: The text uses standard mathematical terminology (Venn diagram, sets, intersections, unions) that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations, units, or locale-specific contexts present.

Verifier: The text consists of universal mathematical terminology (Venn diagram, sets, intersections, unions) that is identical in both US and Australian English. There are no spelling differences, units, or locale-specific references.

Classifier: The text contains the word "factorised", which is the Australian/British spelling. In a US context, this should be localized to the spelling "factorized". No other terminology or unit changes are required.

Verifier: The word "factorised" in the source text is the British/Australian spelling. For a US localization, this should be changed to "factorized". This is a pure spelling change with no impact on the mathematical meaning or units.

Classifier: The text is bi-dialect neutral. It uses basic mathematical concepts ("count by 3s") and standard English grammar that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations, units, or locale-specific terminology present.

Verifier: The text "Why do we skip some numbers when we count by $3$s? We only say the numbers that are $3$ more each time." is linguistically neutral between US and Australian English. There are no spelling differences, no units of measurement, and no locale-specific terminology. The primary classifier's assessment is correct.

Classifier: The text uses standard cardinal and ordinal directions (north-east, south-west, etc.) which are universal across English dialects. There are no AU-specific spellings, units, or terminology present.

Verifier: The content consists of standard English directional terms (north-east, south-west, etc.) and common nouns (hospital, supermarket, map). There are no spelling differences, unit conversions, or locale-specific terminology required for Australian English localization.

Classifier: The text "The underlying system behind pattern changes is called the" and the associated answer choices ("process", "method", "rule", "order") use standard English terminology that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations, metric units, or locale-specific educational terms present.

Verifier: The text and answer choices ("process", "method", "rule", "order") consist of standard English vocabulary that is identical in both US and Australian English. There are no spelling variations, units of measurement, or locale-specific educational terms that require localization.

Classifier: The text uses universal mathematical terminology and standard English vocabulary that is identical in both Australian and US dialects. There are no spelling variations (e.g., -ise/-ize), no metric units, and no locale-specific educational terms.

Verifier: The text consists of universal mathematical concepts and standard English vocabulary that is identical in both US and Australian English. There are no spelling differences, no units of measurement, and no locale-specific educational terminology.

Classifier: The text uses universal mathematical concepts (volume, cubes, space) and standard English spelling common to both AU and US dialects. There are no units, specific school terms, or regional spellings present.

Verifier: The text consists of universal mathematical concepts regarding volume and spatial reasoning. There are no regional spellings, specific curriculum terminology, or units of measurement that require localization between US and AU English.

Classifier: The text is bi-dialect neutral. It contains no AU-specific spellings (like 'sphered' or 'metres'), no metric units, and no region-specific terminology or school contexts. The vocabulary ('spheres', 'balls', 'shapes') is universal across AU and US English.

Verifier: The text "Why is it important to know about spheres?", "Think about things that are shaped like a sphere", and the answer regarding balls and shapes are entirely bi-dialect neutral. There are no spelling differences (e.g., "spheres" is universal), no units, and no region-specific terminology.

Classifier: The content uses standard geometric terminology (transversal, parallel lines, alternate interior angles, acute, equal, supplementary, complementary) that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations (e.g., "centre"), no metric units, and no school-system specific context.

Verifier: The content consists of standard geometric terminology (transversal, parallel lines, alternate interior angles, acute, equal, supplementary, complementary) which is identical in US and Australian English. There are no spelling differences, units, or locale-specific educational contexts present.

Classifier: The text discusses a general mathematical concept (fractions and equal parts) using terminology and spelling that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no units, locale-specific terms (like 'maths' or 'year level'), or spelling variations (like 'modelling' or 'centre') present.

Verifier: The text uses universal mathematical terminology and spelling that is identical in both US and Australian English. There are no units, locale-specific school terms, or spelling variations present.

Classifier: The text uses neutral mathematical terminology ("number line", "mixed numbers", "count") and standard English spelling that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no units, locale-specific terms, or pedagogical differences requiring adjustment.

Verifier: The text consists of standard mathematical terminology ("number line", "mixed numbers") and general descriptive language that is identical in US and Australian English. There are no spelling differences, units, or locale-specific pedagogical terms present.

Classifier: The text uses standard mathematical terminology ("cubic function", "linear factors", "x-intercepts") that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations, units, or locale-specific pedagogical terms present.

Verifier: The text "If a cubic function has three linear factors, then the number of x-intercepts is [?]" uses universal mathematical terminology. There are no spelling differences (e.g., "center" vs "centre"), no units of measurement, and no locale-specific pedagogical terms. The content is identical in US and Australian English.

Classifier: The text uses generic terminology ("coin values", "money problems") and spelling that is identical in both Australian and American English. There are no specific currency units (like dollars or cents) or locale-specific cultural references that would require localization.

Verifier: The text "Why is knowing coin values important when solving money problems?" and the answer "It helps you add coins and see if you have enough to buy things." contain no locale-specific spelling, terminology, or units. The word "coin" is universal, and there are no specific currency symbols or names (like dollars, cents, or pence) that would trigger a localization requirement.

Classifier: The content consists of standard geometric terminology ("parallelogram", "parallel", "perpendicular", "intersecting") that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no units, spellings, or cultural references that require localization.

Verifier: The content consists of standard geometric terminology ("parallelogram", "parallel", "perpendicular", "intersecting") that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no units, spellings, or cultural references that require localization.

Classifier: The word "organise" uses the British/Australian 's' spelling. In US English, this must be localized to "organize". The rest of the content is mathematically neutral and requires no other changes.

Verifier: The primary classifier correctly identified the British/Australian spelling "organise" which requires localization to the US spelling "organize". No other localization issues are present in the text.

Classifier: The text describes a general geometric principle (volume of prisms/cylinders) using terminology that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no units, spellings, or cultural references that require localization.

Verifier: The text describes a universal mathematical concept (volume of prisms and cylinders) using terminology that is identical in both US and Australian English. There are no units, spellings, or cultural references that require localization.

Classifier: The text uses standard mathematical terminology ("linear equation", "graph", "points") that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations (e.g., "colour"), no units of measurement, and no school-system-specific terms.

Verifier: The text "Why do you need at least two points to draw the graph of a linear equation?" and the answer "One point is not enough to show direction, but two points can be joined to make the line." contain no locale-specific spelling, terminology, units, or school system references. The mathematical concepts and language are identical in US and Australian English.

Classifier: The content uses standard mathematical terminology ("grid", "coordinates", "variables") that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations, units, or locale-specific contexts present.

Verifier: The content consists of standard mathematical terminology ("grid", "coordinates", "variables") and common English words ("letters", "directions", "location") that are spelled and used identically in both US and Australian English. There are no units, locale-specific contexts, or spelling variations present.

Classifier: The text is bi-dialect neutral. It uses standard mathematical phrasing ("counting by 3s") and contains no AU-specific spelling, terminology, or units.

Verifier: The text "Why do you add $3$ each time when counting by $3$s?" and the answer "Each new number is $3$ more than the one before it" are bi-dialect neutral. There are no spelling differences (e.g., color/colour), no region-specific terminology, and no units of measurement. The phrasing is standard for both US and AU English.

Classifier: The text uses standard mathematical terminology (bar chart, frequencies, width, heights) that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations (e.g., "color" vs "colour") or unit-based measurements present.

Verifier: The text "Why must the bars be evenly spaced and the same width in a bar chart?" and the answer "So the picture is fair and only the heights show the frequencies" use universal mathematical terminology. There are no spelling differences (like "color" vs "colour"), no units of measurement, and no locale-specific pedagogical terms between US and Australian English in this context.

Classifier: The text is bi-dialect neutral. It contains no AU-specific spellings, terminology, or units. The grammar and vocabulary are appropriate for both Australian and US English.

Verifier: The text "What changes in the picture when some are taken away? There are less things." is linguistically neutral between US and Australian English. It contains no region-specific spelling, terminology, or units.

Classifier: The terminology used ("points", "grid", "coordinates", "symbols", "letters", "numbers") is mathematically universal and identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling differences, unit measurements, or locale-specific pedagogical terms present.

Verifier: The content consists of universal mathematical terminology ("points", "grid", "coordinates", "symbols", "letters", "numbers") that is identical in both US and Australian English. There are no spelling variations, unit measurements, or locale-specific pedagogical differences present.

Classifier: The text uses standard statistical terminology ("cumulative frequency", "running total") that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations (e.g., -ise/-ize), units, or school-system-specific contexts present.

Verifier: The text uses universal statistical terminology ("cumulative frequency", "running total") and contains no spelling, unit, or context-specific differences between Australian and US English.

Classifier: The text uses standard statistical terminology ("dataset", "value", "frequency") that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no units, locale-specific spellings, or school-system-specific terms present.

Verifier: The content consists of standard statistical definitions and terms ("Frequency", "Data", "Probability", "Statistics", "dataset") that are spelled and used identically in both US and Australian English. There are no units, locale-specific spellings, or curriculum-specific references that require localization.

Classifier: The content uses standard statistical terminology ("Cumulative frequency", "running total") that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations, units, or locale-specific contexts present.

Verifier: The content consists of standard mathematical terminology ("Cumulative frequency", "running total", "Relative", "Percentage") that is identical in both US and Australian English. There are no spelling variations, units, or locale-specific pedagogical terms present.

Classifier: The text uses standard geometric terminology (prism, edges, vertices, triangular, pentagonal, rectangular, hexagonal) that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no units, spelling variations, or locale-specific contexts present.

Verifier: The content consists of standard geometric terms (prism, edges, vertices, triangular, pentagonal, rectangular, hexagonal) which are spelled identically and used with the same meaning in both US and Australian English. There are no units, locale-specific contexts, or spelling variations present.

Classifier: The text uses standard geometric terminology (prism, base, triangle, rectangle, pentagon, faces, edges, vertices) that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations (e.g., "centre"), no units of measurement, and no school-context terms that require localization.

Verifier: The text consists of standard geometric terms (prism, base, triangle, rectangle, pentagon, faces, edges, vertices) which are spelled identically in US and Australian English. There are no units, school-specific terminology, or locale-specific stylistic markers present.

Classifier: The content uses standard geometric terminology (prism, octagonal, rectangular, pentagonal, triangular, faces) that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations (e.g., 'centre'), no metric units, and no locale-specific contexts.

Verifier: The content consists of standard geometric terms (prism, octagonal, rectangular, pentagonal, triangular, faces) that are spelled identically in US and Australian English. There are no units, locale-specific contexts, or spelling variations present.

Classifier: The text describes geometric shapes (prism, hexagon, rectangle) using terminology that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no units, spellings (like 'centre' or 'metres'), or school-context terms that require localization.

Verifier: The text uses standard geometric terminology (prism, hexagon, rectangle, triangular, pentagonal, hexagonal, rectangular) that is identical in both US and Australian English. There are no units, locale-specific spellings, or school-system-specific terms present in the source text.

Classifier: The content consists of standard algebraic terminology and notation that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations (e.g., -ise/-ize), units of measurement, or locale-specific terms present in the text.

Verifier: The text contains standard mathematical notation and terminology (line, parabola, intersects, sum, values) that is identical in both US and Australian English. There are no spelling variations, units of measurement, or locale-specific pedagogical terms.

Classifier: The text uses standard mathematical terminology ("linear or quadratic systems", "graphs", "intersect") that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations, units, or locale-specific pedagogical terms present.

Verifier: The text consists of standard mathematical terminology ("linear", "quadratic", "systems", "graphs", "intersect") that is identical in US and Australian English. There are no spelling variations, units of measurement, or locale-specific pedagogical terms present.

Classifier: The text consists of pure mathematical equations and neutral terminology ("line", "meets", "common y-values", "intersect"). There are no AU-specific spellings, metric units, or regional educational terms present.

Verifier: The content consists of mathematical equations and standard geometric terminology ("line", "meets", "intersect") that is universal across English-speaking locales. There are no regional spellings, units, or curriculum-specific terms that require localization for Australia.

Classifier: The text is purely mathematical, involving coordinate geometry (parabolas and lines). It contains no regional spelling, units, or terminology that would differ between Australian and US English.

Verifier: The content is purely mathematical, involving coordinate geometry (lines and parabolas). There are no regional spellings, units, or terminology that require localization between US and Australian English.

Classifier: The text consists of pure mathematical equations and standard English terminology that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no units, regional spellings, or school-system-specific terms.

Verifier: The content consists of mathematical equations and standard English terminology ("intersects", "points", "solve", "intersections") that are identical in both US and Australian English. There are no regional spellings, units, or school-system-specific terms requiring localization.

Classifier: The content consists of standard mathematical terminology (intersects, parabola, equations, factor, tangent) and spelling that is identical in both Australian and American English. There are no units or locale-specific references.

Verifier: The content consists of standard mathematical terminology and equations that are identical in both US and AU English. There are no spelling differences, units, or locale-specific references.

Classifier: The text consists of a standard mathematical problem involving a parabola and a horizontal line. It uses universal mathematical terminology ("value", "line", "touch", "parabola") and notation that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no units, spellings, or cultural references requiring localization.

Verifier: The content is a standard mathematical problem involving a parabola and a horizontal line. The terminology ("value", "line", "touch", "parabola") and the mathematical notation are identical in both US and Australian English. There are no units, locale-specific spellings, or cultural references that require localization.

Classifier: The text uses standard mathematical terminology (graphs, equations, intersections, solutions) that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations (e.g., "modelling"), units, or school-context terms present.

Verifier: The text consists of standard mathematical terminology (graphs, equations, intersections, solutions) that is identical in US and Australian English. There are no spelling variations, units, or locale-specific pedagogical terms.

Classifier: The text discusses a universal mathematical property (zero exponent rule) using terminology that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations (e.g., "centre"), no metric units, and no school-context terms (e.g., "Year 7").

Verifier: The text describes a universal mathematical rule (zero exponent rule) using standard terminology that is identical in both US and Australian English. There are no spelling differences, units, or locale-specific educational terms present.

Classifier: The content consists entirely of mathematical expressions and variables (P, Q, R, x, y) and standard mathematical phrasing ("Assuming", "Which statement is true?"). There are no regional spellings, units, or context-specific terms that require localization between AU and US English.

Verifier: The content is purely mathematical, involving variables (P, Q, R, x, y) and standard mathematical phrasing ("Assuming", "Which statement is true?"). There are no regional spellings, units, or context-specific terms that require localization between AU and US English.

Classifier: The content consists entirely of a mathematical expression and a numeric answer. There are no words, units, or spellings that are specific to any locale. The division symbol and exponent notation are universal in this context.

Verifier: The content is a basic mathematical question with no locale-specific elements. The phrase "What is" and the mathematical notation are universal across English-speaking locales.

Classifier: The content consists of a standard mathematical question and expression that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no units, region-specific spellings, or terminology that require localization.

Verifier: The content is a mathematical expression involving exponents and multiplication. The question "What is the value of..." and the numeric answer "1" are identical in both US and Australian English. There are no units, spellings, or regional terminologies present.

Classifier: The content is a purely mathematical expression involving algebraic simplification and the zero exponent rule. It contains no regional spelling, terminology, units, or context-specific references. It is bi-dialect neutral.

Verifier: The content is a standard mathematical problem involving the zero exponent rule. The word "Simplify" is spelled identically in all English dialects, and the mathematical notation is universal. There are no units, regional terms, or context-specific references requiring localization.

Classifier: The content is a purely mathematical expression involving integers and exponents. There are no words, units, or regional spellings that require localization between AU and US English.

Verifier: The content is a purely mathematical expression with no locale-specific spelling, terminology, or units. It is identical in both US and AU English.

Classifier: The content is purely mathematical and uses universal terminology ("value", "expression", "undefined"). There are no AU-specific spellings, metric units, or regional educational terms. The mathematical notation is standard across both AU and US locales.

Verifier: The content is purely mathematical and uses universal terminology ("value", "expression", "undefined"). There are no regional spellings, metric units, or educational terms specific to any locale. The mathematical notation is standard.

Classifier: The question and answer consist of purely mathematical expressions and standard English phrasing that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no units, regional spellings, or context-specific terms.

Verifier: The content consists of a mathematical expression and a numeric answer. There are no regional spellings, units, or context-specific terms that require localization between US and Australian English.

Classifier: The content is a purely mathematical expression and a numeric answer. There are no linguistic markers, units, or spelling variations that distinguish Australian English from US English.

Verifier: The content consists entirely of a mathematical expression and a single numeric answer. There are no words, units, or cultural markers that require localization between US and Australian English.

Classifier: The question "What is $2^0$ ?" and the answer "1" use universal mathematical notation and neutral English phrasing that requires no localization between AU and US dialects.

Verifier: The content "What is $2^0$ ?" and the answer "1" consist of universal mathematical notation and standard English that is identical in both US and AU locales. No localization is required.

Classifier: The text uses universal statistical terminology ("nominal data") and neutral examples ("Food types", "Spiciness levels", "Restaurant names", "Cuisine types"). There are no AU-specific spellings, units, or cultural references that require localization for a US audience.

Verifier: The text uses universal statistical terminology and neutral examples. There are no spelling differences (e.g., AU vs US), units of measurement, or cultural references that require localization.

Classifier: The content consists of a standard statistics question and categorical options. The terminology used ("ordinal data", "Stages of life", "Blood types", "Product quality levels", "Year levels in school") is bi-dialect neutral and universally understood in both AU and US English. While "Year levels" is common in AU, it is perfectly intelligible and used in US educational contexts (though "Grade levels" is more common, "Year levels" does not require localization as it is not a dialect-exclusive term or spelling error).

Verifier: The term "Year levels" is the standard Australian/British terminology for what is referred to as "Grade levels" in the United States. According to localization standards for educational content, school-specific terminology like "Year level" should be localized to "Grade level" for a US audience. Therefore, this falls under RED.terminology_school_context rather than GREEN.truly_unchanged.

Classifier: The text uses the term "Postal codes", which is universally understood and used in both Australia and the United States (though the US specifically uses ZIP codes, "postal code" is the standard academic/technical term for the data type). There are no AU-specific spellings, units, or school contexts present. The logic of the question regarding nominal data is bi-dialect neutral.

Verifier: The term "Postal codes" is a standard technical and academic term used in both Australia and the United States to describe this data type. While the US uses "ZIP codes" colloquially, "postal code" is universally understood and correct in a statistics context. There are no spelling differences, unit conversions, or locale-specific school contexts required.

Classifier: The content uses standard statistical terminology ("Nominal variables") and general English vocabulary ("categories", "characteristic", "Group", "Order", "Measure", "Count") that is identical in both Australian and American English. There are no spelling differences, units of measurement, or locale-specific references.

Verifier: The content consists of standard statistical terminology ("Nominal variables", "categories", "characteristic") and general verbs ("Group", "Order", "Measure", "Count"). There are no spelling differences between US and AU English for these words, no units of measurement, and no locale-specific context. The classification as GREEN.truly_unchanged is correct.

Classifier: The text discusses statistical data types (ordinal data) and coding values (Low, Medium, High). The terminology and spelling are identical in Australian and US English. There are no units, locale-specific terms, or spelling differences present.

Verifier: The content discusses statistical concepts (ordinal data) and uses universal terminology. There are no spelling differences (e.g., "coded" is the same in US/AU), no units of measurement, and no locale-specific educational context. The text is identical for both US and Australian English.

Classifier: The text contains the word "colour", which is the Australian/British spelling. In a US context, this should be localized to "color". The rest of the content (statistical data types "Nominal" and "Ordinal") is bi-dialect neutral.

Verifier: The source text uses the spelling "colour", which is standard in Australian/British English but requires localization to "color" for a US English context. The statistical terms "Nominal" and "Ordinal" are universal.

Classifier: The text uses standard mathematical terminology ("scientific form", "negative powers", "decimal") that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations (e.g., "centre" vs "center"), no units of measurement, and no school-context terms.

Verifier: The text consists of standard mathematical terminology ("scientific form", "negative powers", "decimal") that is identical in both US and Australian English. There are no spelling variations, units of measurement, or locale-specific pedagogical terms present.

Classifier: The content consists entirely of mathematical notation and neutral terminology ("Explain why", "is not the same as", "is written as"). There are no AU-specific spellings, metric units, or regional contexts present.

Verifier: The content consists of universal mathematical notation and neutral English phrasing. There are no regional spellings, units, or cultural contexts that require localization for Australia.

Classifier: The content is a pure mathematical question regarding scientific notation. It contains no units, no regional spellings, and no locale-specific terminology. The decimal separator used is a period, which is standard in both AU and US English.

Verifier: The content is a standard mathematical question about scientific notation. It contains no units, no regional spellings, and no locale-specific terminology. The decimal separator is a period, which is standard for the target locale (AU). No localization is required.

Classifier: The text "Write $5.4\times{10^{5}}$ as an integer." is mathematically universal and contains no AU-specific spelling, terminology, or units. The answer is a standard numeric value.

Verifier: The content "Write $5.4\times{10^{5}}$ as an integer." is a standard mathematical instruction. It contains no region-specific spelling, terminology, or units. The answer is a pure number. No localization is required for the Australian locale.

Classifier: The content consists of a standard mathematical question about scientific notation. The terminology "scientific notation" is used identically in both Australian and US English. There are no units, regional spellings, or locale-specific contexts present in the question or the answer choices.

Verifier: The content is a standard mathematical question regarding scientific notation. There are no regional spellings, units of measurement, or locale-specific terminology that would require localization between US and Australian English. The mathematical notation is universal.

Classifier: The content is a purely mathematical evaluation of scientific notation and decimals. There are no units, regional spellings, or context-specific terms that require localization between AU and US English.

Verifier: The content is a pure mathematical calculation involving decimals and scientific notation. There are no words, units, or regional formatting differences between AU and US English in this context.

Classifier: The content is a purely mathematical expression involving scientific notation and a decimal answer. There are no linguistic markers, units, or spellings that distinguish Australian English from US English.

Verifier: The content consists entirely of a mathematical expression in LaTeX and a numeric answer. There are no linguistic elements, units, or cultural markers that require localization between US and Australian English.

Classifier: The content is a standard mathematical question about scientific notation. It contains no units, no region-specific spelling, and no terminology that differs between Australian and US English. The mathematical notation is universal.

Verifier: The content is a pure mathematical question regarding scientific notation. It contains no units, no region-specific terminology, and no spelling variations between US and Australian English. The mathematical notation used is universal.

Classifier: The content is purely mathematical, discussing scientific notation and decimal representation. There are no regional spellings, units of measurement, or locale-specific terminology. The phrasing is bi-dialect neutral.

Verifier: The content is purely mathematical, focusing on scientific notation and decimal placement. There are no units of measurement, regional spellings, or locale-specific terminology. The text is universally applicable across English dialects.

Classifier: The question and answer use standard mathematical terminology ("scientific notation") and notation that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no units, regional spellings, or locale-specific contexts present.

Verifier: The content consists of a mathematical question about scientific notation. The terminology and notation are universal across English locales (US and AU). There are no units, regional spellings, or curriculum-specific terms that require localization.

Classifier: The prompt "Write $132$ in scientific notation" and the mathematical answer use terminology and notation that are identical in both Australian and US English. There are no units, locale-specific spellings, or regional terms present.

Verifier: The content "Write $132$ in scientific notation" and the corresponding answer "1.32\cdot10^{2}" are mathematically universal. There are no regional spellings, units, or terminology differences between US and Australian English in this context.

Classifier: The text "Write $1000$ in scientific notation" and the corresponding answer "1\cdot10^{3}" use universally accepted mathematical terminology and notation. There are no AU-specific spellings, units, or cultural contexts present.

Verifier: The content "Write $1000$ in scientific notation" and the answer "1\cdot10^{3}" consist of universal mathematical notation and terminology. There are no regional spellings, units, or cultural references that require localization for an Australian context.

Classifier: The content consists entirely of a mathematical expression in scientific notation and numeric answers. There are no words, units, or locale-specific formatting that require localization between AU and US English.

Verifier: The content consists solely of a mathematical expression in scientific notation and numeric multiple-choice options. There are no words, units, or locale-specific formatting (like decimal commas) that would require localization between US and AU English.

Classifier: The content is a purely mathematical expression involving scientific notation and a decimal answer. There are no words, units, or spellings that are specific to any locale.

Verifier: The content consists entirely of a mathematical expression in LaTeX and a numeric answer. There are no locale-specific terms, units, or spellings.

Classifier: The content is a pure mathematical problem involving scientific notation. There are no units, regional spellings, or locale-specific terminology. The notation used ($6.25 \times 10^{-3}$) is standard in both AU and US English.

Verifier: The content is a standard mathematical problem involving scientific notation. It contains no units, regional spellings, or locale-specific terminology. The notation and phrasing are universal across English-speaking regions.

Classifier: The text "Write $0.00321$ in scientific notation." is mathematically universal and contains no AU-specific spelling, terminology, or units. The answer is a standard mathematical expression.

Verifier: The content "Write $0.00321$ in scientific notation." and the corresponding answer are purely mathematical. There are no regional spellings, specific terminology, or units of measurement that require localization for the Australian context.

Classifier: The text uses universal mathematical terminology and notation. There are no AU-specific spellings, units, or cultural references. The use of degrees (0° to 360°) and the unit circle concept is standard in both AU and US curricula.

Verifier: The content consists of universal mathematical concepts (trigonometry, unit circle, quadrants) and notation. There are no locale-specific spellings, units, or cultural references that require localization for Australia.

Classifier: The text consists of standard mathematical terminology (trigonometric functions, quadrants) and notation that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no units, regional spellings, or locale-specific contexts.

Verifier: The text uses universal mathematical terminology and notation. There are no regional spellings, units, or locale-specific contexts that require localization between US and Australian English.

Classifier: The content consists of a standard trigonometric problem using universal mathematical notation (sine, cosine, theta, pi). There are no regional spellings, units, or terminology specific to Australia or the United States. The phrasing is bi-dialect neutral.

Verifier: The content is a standard trigonometric problem using universal mathematical notation. There are no regional spellings, units, or terminology that require localization between US and AU English.

Classifier: The text is a standard mathematical question about a parabola and its intersection with the x-axis. It contains no AU-specific spelling, terminology, or units. The language is bi-dialect neutral.

Verifier: The text is a standard mathematical problem involving a quadratic equation and coordinate geometry. It contains no region-specific spelling, terminology, or units. The language is neutral and applicable to both US and AU English without modification.

Classifier: The text uses standard mathematical terminology (coefficient, discriminant, parabola, x-axis) that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations (e.g., "centre"), no units, and no locale-specific educational terms.

Verifier: The text consists of universal mathematical terminology ("coefficient", "discriminant", "parabola", "x-axis") and standard English that does not vary between US and Australian locales. There are no units, locale-specific spellings, or educational system references.

Classifier: The content consists of a standard mathematical question about a parabola and directional answers ("Upwards", "Downwards"). There are no AU-specific spellings, units, or terminology. The phrasing is bi-dialect neutral and universally understood in both Australian and US English contexts.

Verifier: The content is purely mathematical and uses terminology ("parabola", "opens upwards/downwards") that is identical in both US and Australian English. There are no units, spellings, or school-context terms requiring localization.

Classifier: The content consists of a standard mathematical problem regarding the discriminant of a parabola. The terminology ("parabola", "x-intercepts", "discriminant") and the mathematical notation are universal across Australian and US English. There are no units, regional spellings, or locale-specific educational terms present.

Verifier: The content is a standard mathematical problem involving a parabola and its discriminant. The terminology ("parabola", "x-intercepts", "discriminant") and the mathematical notation are identical in both US and Australian English. There are no units, regional spellings, or locale-specific educational contexts that require localization.

Classifier: The text is purely mathematical, using standard algebraic notation and terminology ("function", "graph", "real x-intercepts") that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no units, spellings, or cultural references that require localization.

Verifier: The content is purely mathematical, involving a quadratic function and its x-intercepts. The terminology ("function", "graph", "real x-intercepts") and notation are universal across US and Australian English. There are no spellings, units, or cultural contexts that require localization.

Classifier: The text uses standard mathematical terminology (discriminant, parabola, coefficient, x-intercepts, concavity) that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations (e.g., "centre"), no metric units, and no school-system specific terms.

Verifier: The text consists of universal mathematical terminology (discriminant, parabola, coefficient, x-intercepts, concavity) that is identical in US and Australian English. There are no spelling variations, metric units, or region-specific educational terms.

Classifier: The text uses standard mathematical terminology (parabola, concave downwards, x-axis) and notation that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no units, region-specific spellings, or curriculum-specific terms requiring localization.

Verifier: The content consists of standard mathematical terminology and notation that is identical in both US and Australian English. There are no spelling differences (e.g., "concave downwards" is standard in both), no units of measurement, and no region-specific curriculum terms.

Classifier: The text uses standard mathematical terminology ("parabola", "x-intercepts", "real") and notation that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no units, regional spellings, or locale-specific contexts present.

Verifier: The content consists of a mathematical equation and standard terminology ("parabola", "real x-intercepts") that is identical in both US and Australian English. There are no regional spellings, units, or locale-specific contexts requiring localization.

Classifier: The content consists of a standard mathematical statement about a parabola and its x-intercepts. The terminology ("parabola", "x-intercepts") and the mathematical notation are identical in both Australian and US English. There are no units, spellings, or cultural references that require localization.

Verifier: The content is a standard mathematical statement about a parabola. The terminology ("parabola", "x-intercepts") and the mathematical notation are identical in both US and Australian English. There are no spelling differences, units, or cultural contexts that require localization.

Classifier: The content is a purely mathematical expression involving numbers and symbols that are identical in both Australian and US English. There are no units, spellings, or terminology that require localization.

Verifier: The content consists of a mathematical expression ($0.191\times10000$) and a numeric answer (1910). There are no linguistic elements, units, or regional conventions that differ between US and Australian English.

Classifier: The content is a purely mathematical expression involving scientific notation and a numeric result. There are no units, regional spellings, or terminology that would differ between Australian and US English.

Verifier: The content consists of a mathematical expression in scientific notation and a numeric answer. There are no linguistic elements, units, or regional conventions that require localization between US and Australian English.

Classifier: The content is a purely mathematical calculation with no units, regional spelling, or terminology. It is bi-dialect neutral.

Verifier: The content is a pure mathematical expression ($0.1\times10^2$) and a numeric answer (10). There are no units, regional spellings, or locale-specific terminology. It is universally applicable across English dialects.

Classifier: The content is a simple arithmetic multiplication problem using universal mathematical notation. There are no units, regional spellings, or terminology that would differ between Australian and US English.

Verifier: The content consists of a simple arithmetic question using universal mathematical notation. There are no units, regional spellings, or terminology that require localization between US and AU English.

Classifier: The text uses standard mathematical terminology ("decimal", "multiplied", "original number") and notation ($10^{2}$) that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no units, regional spellings, or locale-specific contexts present.

Verifier: The text consists of universal mathematical terminology ("decimal", "multiplied", "original number") and standard LaTeX notation. There are no regional spellings, units of measurement, or locale-specific pedagogical contexts that require localization between US and Australian English.

Classifier: The content consists of a pure mathematical explanation of multiplication by powers of ten. There are no regional spellings, units, or terminology that differ between Australian and US English.

Verifier: The content is purely mathematical, explaining the process of multiplying a decimal by a power of ten. There are no regional spellings, units, or terminology that require localization between US and Australian English.

Classifier: The content consists of a pure mathematical explanation regarding place value and multiplication by powers of ten. There are no regional spellings, units of measurement, or school-context terminology that would differ between Australian and US English.

Verifier: The content is a pure mathematical explanation of place value and multiplication by powers of ten. There are no regional spellings, units of measurement, or school-system specific terminology that require localization between US and Australian English.

Classifier: The text uses universal mathematical terminology and concepts (decimal point, place value chart, multiplying by 10) that are identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling differences, unit measurements, or locale-specific pedagogical terms present.

Verifier: The text describes a universal mathematical concept (multiplying decimals by 10) using terminology that is identical in US and Australian English. There are no spelling differences, unit measurements, or locale-specific pedagogical terms.

Classifier: The content is a purely mathematical operation involving decimal multiplication. There are no units, regional spellings, or context-specific terms that require localization between AU and US English.

Verifier: The content is a purely mathematical expression ($16.141 \times 100$) with a numeric answer. It contains no units, regional spellings, or locale-specific terminology.

Classifier: The content consists of a purely mathematical expression and a numeric answer. There are no words, units, or spellings that are specific to any locale. The use of spaces as a thousands separator in "1 000 000" is common in many regions but is mathematically unambiguous and does not require localization to US standard (1,000,000) to be understood or correct in a US context, though it is bi-dialect neutral in its current form.

Verifier: The content is a purely mathematical expression. While the use of a space as a thousands separator (1 000 000) differs from the US standard comma (1,000,000), it is a globally recognized mathematical notation that is unambiguous and does not require localization to be understood or correct in a US educational context. There are no words, units, or spellings that necessitate a change.

Classifier: The content is a purely mathematical expression involving scientific notation and its decimal equivalent. There are no linguistic markers, units, or regional spellings that would require localization between AU and US English.

Verifier: The content consists entirely of a mathematical expression in LaTeX ($1.36\times10^3$) and a numeric answer (1360). There are no linguistic elements, units, or regional conventions that differ between US and AU English.

Classifier: The text discusses a universal mathematical concept (cube roots of negative numbers) using terminology that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations, units, or locale-specific pedagogical terms present.

Verifier: The content discusses a universal mathematical property (cube roots of negative numbers). The terminology used ("real cube roots", "negative numbers") is identical in US and Australian English. There are no spelling variations, units, or locale-specific pedagogical references present.

Classifier: The content is a pure mathematical problem involving a cube root and integer ranges. There are no units, no regional spellings, and no locale-specific terminology. It is bi-dialect neutral.

Verifier: The content is a pure mathematical problem involving a cube root and integer ranges. There are no units, regional spellings, or locale-specific terms. The math is universal and requires no localization.

Classifier: The content is a purely mathematical question involving a cube root calculation. It contains no regional spelling, terminology, units, or context-specific references. It is bi-dialect neutral.

Verifier: The content is a pure mathematical expression (cube root of 216) and numeric answers. There are no regional spellings, units, or terminology that require localization.

Classifier: The content is purely mathematical, using standard LaTeX notation and neutral English phrasing ("Fill in the blank", "The value of... lies between"). There are no regional spellings, units, or terminology that require localization from AU to US.

Verifier: The content is purely mathematical and uses neutral English phrasing that does not require localization between AU and US English. There are no units, regional spellings, or school-specific terms.

Classifier: The content is a purely mathematical expression involving a cube root calculation. There are no words, units, or locale-specific conventions present. It is bi-dialect neutral.

Verifier: The content consists of a standard mathematical command and expression that does not require localization.

Classifier: The content is a purely mathematical expression and a numeric answer. Mathematical notation for cube roots and integers is universal across Australian and US English, with no spelling, terminology, or units present.

Verifier: The content consists of a mathematical expression ($\sqrt[3]{64}$) and a numeric answer (4). Mathematical notation for radicals and integers is identical in Australian and US English. There are no words, units, or cultural contexts that require localization.

Classifier: The content consists of a mathematical statement about perfect cubes and cube roots. The terminology ("perfect cube", "cube root") and the mathematical notation are identical in both Australian and US English. There are no units, spellings, or cultural references that require localization.

Verifier: The content is a mathematical statement regarding perfect cubes and cube roots. The terminology and notation are identical in both US and Australian English. There are no spelling differences, units, or cultural contexts requiring localization.

Classifier: The text consists of universal mathematical concepts (cube root) and numbers. There are no regional spellings, units, or terminology specific to Australia or the United States. The phrasing is bi-dialect neutral.

Verifier: The text "Explain why the cube root of $8$ is $2$." and the corresponding answer contain only universal mathematical concepts and numbers. There are no regional spellings, units, or terminology that differ between US and AU English.

Classifier: The content is a pure mathematical expression using standard English phrasing that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no regional spellings, units, or terminology.

Verifier: The content is a standard mathematical expression and a question phrase that is identical in both US and Australian English. There are no units, regional spellings, or school-specific terminology.

Classifier: The text uses standard mathematical terminology ("cube root") and universal numeric values. There are no AU-specific spellings, metric units, or school-context terms that require localization for a US audience.

Verifier: The content consists of universal mathematical concepts and numeric values. There are no regional spellings, units, or school-system specific terms that require localization from AU to US English.

Classifier: The content is a purely mathematical question involving a cube root calculation. It contains no regional spelling, terminology, units, or cultural references. It is bi-dialect neutral.

Verifier: The content is a pure mathematical problem asking for the closest integer to a cube root. It contains no regional spelling, terminology, units, or cultural context that would require localization. It is universally applicable across English dialects.

Classifier: The units used (days, years, weeks) are universal time measurements shared by both AU and US locales. There are no spelling variations (e.g., "colour", "metre") or region-specific terminology present in the text.

Verifier: The units used (days, years, weeks) are standard time measurements used in both US and AU locales. There are no spelling differences or region-specific terms in the text. The math remains valid across both locales without modification.

Classifier: The question uses universal time units (weeks, years, days) that are identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling differences (e.g., "color" vs "colour") or terminology differences present in the text.

Verifier: The content uses universal time units (weeks, years, days) and standard numeric values. There are no spelling variations (e.g., US vs AU) or locale-specific terminology present in the question, hint, or suffix.

Classifier: The content involves converting days to years. Both 'days' and 'years' are universal units of time used identically in both AU and US English. There are no spelling differences (e.g., 'year' vs 'year') or terminology differences involved in this specific mathematical context.

Verifier: The units 'days' and 'years' are universal units of time used identically in both US and AU English. No localization of units, spelling, or terminology is required.

Classifier: The content uses universal time units (years, weeks, days) that are identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling differences, terminology shifts, or metric/imperial unit conversions required.

Verifier: The content involves time units (years, weeks, days) which are universal and identical in both US and Australian English. There are no spelling differences, terminology shifts, or unit conversions required between the locales.

Classifier: The text uses universal units of time (weeks, years) and names (Joshua, Daisy) that are common to both Australian and US English. There are no spelling differences (e.g., "color" vs "colour"), no metric units requiring conversion, and no school-context terminology that differs between the locales. The mathematical logic (52 weeks in a year) is universal.

Verifier: The text uses universal units of time (weeks, years) and names (Joshua, Daisy) that are common to both Australian and US English. There are no spelling differences, no metric units requiring conversion, and no school-context terminology that differs between the locales. The mathematical logic (52 weeks in a year) is universal.

Classifier: The text uses universal mathematical and temporal terminology ("week", "days", "year") that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations (e.g., "roster" is standard in both), no metric units requiring conversion, and no school-context terms that differ between the locales.

Verifier: The text uses universal mathematical and temporal terminology ("week", "days", "year") that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations, no metric units requiring conversion, and no school-context terms that differ between the locales. The term "roster" is standard in both dialects.

Classifier: The units used (days, weeks, years) are universal across both Australian and US English. There are no spelling differences or locale-specific terms present in the text.

Verifier: The units of time (days, weeks, years) and the vocabulary used in the question and hint are universal across Australian and US English. There are no spelling or terminology differences.

Classifier: The question "What is the largest factor of $50$ ?" uses universal mathematical terminology ("factor") and numeric values that are identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations, units, or locale-specific contexts present.

Verifier: The content "What is the largest factor of $50$ ?" consists of universal mathematical terminology and numeric values that do not vary between US and Australian English. There are no units, spelling differences, or locale-specific contexts.

Classifier: The question and answer set use universal mathematical terminology ("factors", "set") and numeric values. There are no AU-specific spellings, units, or cultural references. The content is bi-dialect neutral.

Verifier: The content consists of a universal mathematical question regarding factors of a number. There are no units, locale-specific spellings, or cultural references that require localization. The terminology used ("factors", "set") is standard across all English dialects.

Classifier: The content is a standard mathematical question about factors. The terminology ("factors", "set") and the numerical values are identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations, units, or locale-specific contexts present.

Verifier: The content is a standard mathematical question regarding factors. The terminology ("factors", "set") and the numerical values are identical in both Australian and US English. There are no spelling variations, units, or locale-specific contexts present.

Classifier: The text "Find the greatest factor of $42$ that is less than $10$." is mathematically universal and contains no dialect-specific spelling, terminology, or units. It is bi-dialect neutral.

Verifier: The text "Find the greatest factor of $42$ that is less than $10$." is mathematically universal. It contains no units, no locale-specific terminology, and no spelling variations. It is bi-dialect neutral and requires no localization.

Classifier: The text consists of standard mathematical terminology ("factor", "between") and numbers. There are no spelling variations, unit measurements, or region-specific terms that require localization from AU to US English.

Verifier: The text "Write a factor of $70$ that is between $11$ and $20$." contains no region-specific spelling, terminology, or units. It is standard mathematical English applicable to both AU and US locales.

Classifier: The text "Write a common factor of $28$ and $63$ other than $1$." uses standard mathematical terminology that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no units, regional spellings, or locale-specific contexts present.

Verifier: The text "Write a common factor of $28$ and $63$ other than $1$." contains no locale-specific terminology, spelling, or units. It is mathematically universal between US and AU English.

Classifier: The text "What is the smallest factor of $24$ other than $1$?" uses standard mathematical terminology ("factor") that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no units, locale-specific spellings, or cultural references.

Verifier: The text "What is the smallest factor of $24$ other than $1$?" is mathematically universal. There are no spellings, units, or terminology specific to either US or Australian English. The primary classifier's assessment is correct.

Classifier: The text "Find the second largest factor of $124$." is mathematically universal and contains no AU-specific spelling, terminology, or units. It is bi-dialect neutral.

Verifier: The text "Find the second largest factor of $124$." uses universal mathematical terminology and contains no regional spelling, units, or school-context terms that require localization for Australia.

Classifier: The content is a pure mathematics question using terminology ("distinct factors") that is standard and identical in both Australian and American English. There are no units, regional spellings, or locale-specific contexts.

Verifier: The content is a standard number theory question. The term "distinct factors" is universal across English dialects (US/AU/UK). There are no units, regional spellings, or cultural contexts that require localization.

Classifier: The text is a pure mathematical question about factors of an integer. It contains no regional spelling, terminology, or units. It is bi-dialect neutral.

Verifier: The content is a pure mathematical question regarding the factors of an integer. It contains no regional spelling, terminology, units, or cultural references. It is universally applicable across English dialects.

Classifier: The content consists of a simple mathematical question about factors and lists of numbers. There are no regional spellings, units, or terminology that differ between Australian and US English.

Verifier: The content is a pure mathematical question regarding factors of a number. There are no units, regional spellings, or terminology that require localization between US and Australian English.

Classifier: The content is purely mathematical, using standard LaTeX notation for functions, domains, and intervals. There are no regional spellings, units, or terminology that distinguish Australian English from US English.

Verifier: The content is purely mathematical, consisting of a function definition, domain notation in LaTeX, and a request for a numeric value. There are no linguistic markers, units, or regional terminology that would require localization between US and Australian English.

Classifier: The text discusses a universal mathematical concept (implied domain of a square root function) using standard terminology that is identical in both Australian and US English. There are no units, locale-specific spellings, or school-system-specific terms present.

Verifier: The text describes a universal mathematical concept (domain of a square root function) using standard terminology that is identical in both US and Australian English. There are no units, locale-specific spellings, or school-system-specific terms that require localization.